Re: [PATCH net-next] phy: micrel: ksz8041nl: do not use power down mode

[Christophe Leroy]

Le 18/10/2021 à 12:18, Francesco Dolcini a écrit :
> Hello Christophe,
>
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:53:03AM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > Le 18/10/2021 à 11:42, Francesco Dolcini a écrit :
> > > From: Stefan Agner <stefan@xxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Some Micrel KSZ8041NL PHY chips exhibit continous RX errors after using
> > > the power down mode bit (0.11). If the PHY is taken out of power down
> > > mode in a certain temperature range, the PHY enters a weird state which
> > > leads to continously reporting RX errors. In that state, the MAC is not
> > > able to receive or send any Ethernet frames and the activity LED is
> > > constantly blinking. Since Linux is using the suspend callback when the
> > > interface is taken down, ending up in that state can easily happen
> > > during a normal startup.
> > >
> > > Micrel confirmed the issue in errata DS80000700A [*], caused by abnormal
> > > clock recovery when using power down mode. Even the latest revision (A4,
> > > Revision ID 0x1513) seems to suffer that problem, and according to the
> > > errata is not going to be fixed.
> > >
> > > Remove the suspend/resume callback to avoid using the power down mode
> > > completely.
> >
> > As far as I can see in the ERRATA, KSZ8041 RNLI also has the bug.
> > Shoudn't you also remove the suspend/resume on that one (which follows in
> > ksphy_driver[])
>
> Yes, I could, however this patch is coming out of a real issue we had with
> KSZ8041NL with this specific phy id (and we have such a patch in our linux
> branch since years).
>
> On the other hand the entry for KSZ8041RNLI in the driver is somehow weird,
> since the phy id according to the original commit does not even exists on
> the datasheet. Would you be confident applying such errata for that phyid
> without having a way of testing it?


If your patch was to add the suspend/resume capability I would agree 
with you, but here we are talking about removing it, so what risk are we 
taking ?

In addition, commit 4bd7b5127bd0 ("micrel: add support for KSZ8041RNLI") 
clearly tells that the only thing it did was to copy KSZ8041NL entry, so 
for me updating both entries would really make sense.

It looks odd to me that you refer in your commit log to an ERRATA that 
tells you that the bug also exists on the KSZ8041RNLI and you apply it 
only partly.

Christophe