RE: [PATCH] rtw89: fix error function parameter

[Pkshih]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: kvalo=codeaurora.org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <kvalo=codeaurora.org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Kalle
> Valo
> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021 6:04 PM
> To: Pkshih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx; davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; kuba@xxxxxxxxxx; lv.ruyi@xxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Zeal Robot
> <zealci@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtw89: fix error function parameter
> 
> Pkshih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: kvalo=codeaurora.org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> <kvalo=codeaurora.org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Kalle
> >> Valo
> >> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021 4:50 PM
> >> To: cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx
> >> Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; kuba@xxxxxxxxxx; Pkshih
> >> <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx>; lv.ruyi@xxxxxxxxxx;
> >> linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> >> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Zeal Robot
> >> <zealci@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtw89: fix error function parameter
> >>
> >> cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >>
> >> > From: Lv Ruyi <lv.ruyi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >
> >> > This patch fixes the following Coccinelle warning:
> >> > drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852a.c:753:
> >> > WARNING  possible condition with no effect (if == else)
> >> >
> >> > Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Lv Ruyi <lv.ruyi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > Acked-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Failed to apply, please rebase on top of wireless-drivers-next.
> >>
> >> error: patch failed: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852a.c:753
> >> error: drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852a.c: patch does not apply
> >> error: Did you hand edit your patch?
> >> It does not apply to blobs recorded in its index.
> >> hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch
> >> Applying: rtw89: fix error function parameter
> >> Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
> >> Patch failed at 0001 rtw89: fix error function parameter
> >>
> >> Patch set to Changes Requested.
> >>
> >
> > I think this is because the patch is translated into spaces instead of tabs,
> > in this and following statements.
> > "                if (is_2g)"
> 
> Ah, I did wonder why it failed as I didn't see any similar patches. We
> have an item about this in the wiki:
> 
> https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches#format_issues
> 

I don't know why neither.

I check the mail header of this patch, the mailer is
"X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1". It should work properly.

Lv Ruyi, could you help to check what happens?

--
Ping-Ke