Re: [PATCH 21/20] signal: Replace force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV) with force_fatal_sig(SIGSEGV)

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Eric,

Patch 21/20?

On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 11:52 PM Eric W. Biederman
<ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Now that force_fatal_sig exists it is unnecessary and a bit confusing
> to use force_sigsegv in cases where the simpler force_fatal_sig is
> wanted.  So change every instance we can to make the code clearer.
>
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

>  arch/m68k/kernel/traps.c        | 2 +-

Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds