Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI, APEI, EINJ: Relax platform response timeout to 1 second.
From: Luck, Tony
Date: Fri Oct 22 2021 - 19:54:57 EST
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 09:44:24PM +0800, Shuai Xue wrote:
> When injecting an error into the platform, the OSPM executes an
> EXECUTE_OPERATION action to instruct the platform to begin the injection
> operation. And then, the OSPM busy waits for a while by continually
> executing CHECK_BUSY_STATUS action until the platform indicates that the
> operation is complete. More specifically, the platform is limited to
> respond within 1 millisecond right now. This is too strict for some
> platforms.
>
> For example, in Arm platform, when injecting a Processor Correctable error,
> the OSPM will warn:
> Firmware does not respond in time.
>
> And a message is printed on the console:
> echo: write error: Input/output error
>
> We observe that the waiting time for DDR error injection is about 10 ms
> and that for PCIe error injection is about 500 ms in Arm platform.
>
> In this patch, we relax the response timeout to 1 second and allow user to
> pass the time out value as a argument.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changelog v1 -> v2:
> - Implemented the timeout in msleep instead of udelay.
> - Link to the v1 patch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/10/14/1402
> ---
> drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c | 16 +++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c
> index 133156759551..e411eb30e0ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c
> @@ -28,9 +28,9 @@
> #undef pr_fmt
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) "EINJ: " fmt
>
> -#define SPIN_UNIT 100 /* 100ns */
> -/* Firmware should respond within 1 milliseconds */
> -#define FIRMWARE_TIMEOUT (1 * NSEC_PER_MSEC)
> +#define SLEEP_UNIT 1 /* 1ms */
I know I pointed you to msleep() ... sorry, I was wrong. For a
1 ms sleep the recommendation is to use usleep_range()
See this write-up in Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst:
- Why not msleep for (1ms - 20ms)?
Explained originally here:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/15327.1186166232@xxxxxxx
msleep(1~20) may not do what the caller intends, and
will often sleep longer (~20 ms actual sleep for any
value given in the 1~20ms range). In many cases this
is not the desired behavior.
To answer the question posed in that document on "What is a good range?"
I don't think injection cares too much about precision here. Maybe go
with
usleep_range(1000, 5000);
[with #defines for SLEEP_UNIT_MIN, SLEEP_UNIT_MAX instead of those
numbers]
> +/* Firmware should respond within 1 seconds */
> +#define FIRMWARE_TIMEOUT (1 * MSEC_PER_SEC)
> #define ACPI5_VENDOR_BIT BIT(31)
> #define MEM_ERROR_MASK (ACPI_EINJ_MEMORY_CORRECTABLE | \
> ACPI_EINJ_MEMORY_UNCORRECTABLE | \
> @@ -40,6 +40,8 @@
> * ACPI version 5 provides a SET_ERROR_TYPE_WITH_ADDRESS action.
> */
> static int acpi5;
> +static int timeout_default = FIRMWARE_TIMEOUT;
> +module_param(timeout_default, int, 0644);
You've set the default to 1 second. Who would use this parameter?
Do you anticipate systems that take even longer to inject?
A user might set a shorter limit ... but I don't see why they
would want to.
>
> struct set_error_type_with_address {
> u32 type;
> @@ -171,12 +173,12 @@ static int einj_get_available_error_type(u32 *type)
>
> static int einj_timedout(u64 *t)
> {
> - if ((s64)*t < SPIN_UNIT) {
> + if ((s64)*t < SLEEP_UNIT) {
> pr_warn(FW_WARN "Firmware does not respond in time\n");
> return 1;
> }
> - *t -= SPIN_UNIT;
> - ndelay(SPIN_UNIT);
> + *t -= SLEEP_UNIT;
> + msleep(SLEEP_UNIT);
> touch_nmi_watchdog();
Since we are sleeping instead of spinning, maybe we don't need to
touch the nmi watchdog?
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -403,7 +405,7 @@ static int __einj_error_inject(u32 type, u32 flags, u64 param1, u64 param2,
> u64 param3, u64 param4)
> {
> struct apei_exec_context ctx;
> - u64 val, trigger_paddr, timeout = FIRMWARE_TIMEOUT;
> + u64 val, trigger_paddr, timeout = timeout_default;
> int rc;
>
> einj_exec_ctx_init(&ctx);
> --
> 2.20.1.12.g72788fdb
>
-Tony