Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: stm32: fix a leak by resetting pcsel before disabling vdda

From: Jonathan Cameron
Date: Sun Oct 24 2021 - 12:03:41 EST


On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 14:38:52 +0200
Olivier MOYSAN <olivier.moysan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I'll probably reword the description here as 'leak' tends to mean memory
leak rather than current.

> Hi Fabrice,
>
> On 10/22/21 2:19 PM, Fabrice Gasnier wrote:
> > Some I/Os are connected to ADC input channels, when the corresponding bit
> > in PCSEL register are set on STM32H7 and STM32MP15. This is done in the
> > prepare routine of stm32-adc driver.
> > There are constraints here, as PCSEL shouldn't be set when VDDA supply
> > is disabled. Enabling/disabling of VDDA supply in done via stm32-adc-core
> > runtime PM routines (before/after ADC is enabled/disabled).
> >
> > Currently, PCSEL remains set when disabling ADC. Later on, PM runtime
> > can disable the VDDA supply. This creates some conditions on I/Os that
> > can start to leak current.
> > So PCSEL needs to be cleared when disabling the ADC.
> >
> > Fixes: 95e339b6e85d ("iio: adc: stm32: add support for STM32H7")
> >

No line break here as Fixes forms part of the tag block.

> > Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Given timing wrt to being too near merge window, I'll let this it on
list a while longer as it'll be post rc1 material now anyway.

I can fix the above whilst applying if nothing else comes up.

Jonathan

> > ---
> > drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c
> > index 5088de8..e3e7541 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c
> > @@ -975,6 +975,7 @@ static void stm32h7_adc_unprepare(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> > {
> > struct stm32_adc *adc = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> >
> > + stm32_adc_writel(adc, STM32H7_ADC_PCSEL, 0);
> > stm32h7_adc_disable(indio_dev);
> > stm32h7_adc_enter_pwr_down(adc);
> > }
> >
>
> Reviewed-by: Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks
> Olivier