RE: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add support of eMMC PHY for Intel Thunder Bay

[A, Rashmi]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 5, 2021 4:05 PM
> To: A, Rashmi <rashmi.a@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>; Michal Simek
> <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-mmc <linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux
> ARM <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Kishon <kishon@xxxxxx>; Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-phy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Mark
> Gross <mgross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; kris.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Zhou, Furong
> <furong.zhou@xxxxxxxxx>; Sangannavar, Mallikarjunappa
> <mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@xxxxxxxxx>; Hunter, Adrian
> <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>; Vaidya, Mahesh R
> <mahesh.r.vaidya@xxxxxxxxx>; Srikandan, Nandhini
> <nandhini.srikandan@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add support of eMMC PHY for Intel Thunder Bay
> 
> On 04-10-21, 06:04, A, Rashmi wrote:
> 
> > Applied patch1 and patch2 for next, thus leaving the phy changes in
> > patch3 and patch 4 for Kishon/Vinod to pick up.
> >
> > Thanks and kind regards
> > Uffe
> >
> >
> > Thanks Uffe,
> > Hi Kishon/Vinod,
> > 	Please let me know if you have any comments
> 
> Need ack from Rob on binding patch
> 
> --
> ~Vinod

Hi Rob Herring,
	Please help to review the eMMC dt-binding patches

-Rashmi