Re: [PATCH 0/2] nbd: fix sanity check for first_minor

[yukuai (C)]

On 2021/10/21 21:37, yukuai (C) wrote:
> On 2021/10/21 21:13, yukuai (C) wrote:
> > On 2021/10/21 20:35, Pavel Skripkin wrote:
> > > On 10/21/21 15:29, Yu Kuai wrote:
> > > > Yu Kuai (2):
> > > >    nbd: fix max value for 'first_minor'
> > > >    nbd: fix possible overflow for 'first_minor' in nbd_dev_add()
> > > >
> > > >   drivers/block/nbd.c | 6 +++---
> > > >   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Hi, Yu!
> > >
> > > Thank you for the fix, but this wrong check should be just removed, 
> > > since root case of wrong sysfs file creation was fixed, as Christoph 
> > > said [1]
>
> Hi, Christoph
>
> By the way, if we remove the checking, there will be two kernel warnings
> when the problem happens. Maybe keeping the checking is better?

friendly ping ...
> [   19.860640] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/dev/block/43:0'
> [   19.861659] CPU: 1 PID: 872 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 
> 5.15.0-rc6-next-20211020-00001-g2f1
> [   19.863175] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), 
> BIOS ?-20190727_0738364
> [   19.865183] Call Trace:
> [   19.866512]  <TASK>
> [   19.866863]  ? dump_stack_lvl+0x73/0x9f
> [   19.867941]  ? dump_stack+0x13/0x1b
> [   19.868475]  ? sysfs_warn_dup.cold+0x27/0x45
> [   19.869075]  ? sysfs_do_create_link_sd.isra.0+0x131/0x150
> [   19.869818]  ? sysfs_create_link+0x29/0x60
> [   19.870459]  ? device_add+0xbd6/0xf60
> [   19.871032]  ? _printk+0x5f/0x7d
> [   19.871518]  ? device_add_disk+0x153/0x5d0
> [   19.872160]  ? nbd_dev_add+0x30e/0x470 [nbd]
> [   19.872828]  ? 0xffffffffc0060000
> [   19.873332]  ? nbd_init+0x1dc/0x1000 [nbd]
> [   19.873924]  ? do_one_initcall+0x71/0x3a0
> [   19.874534]  ? gcov_event+0x70/0x690
> [   19.875058]  ? do_init_module+0xa6/0x350
> [   19.875587]  ? load_module+0x2587/0x2720
> [   19.876130]  ? kernel_read+0x31/0xb0
> [   19.876638]  ? kernel_read_file+0x15a/0x360
> [   19.877271]  ? __do_sys_finit_module+0xe5/0x190
> [   19.877951]  ? __do_sys_finit_module+0xe5/0x190
> [   19.878563]  ? __x64_sys_finit_module+0x1e/0x30
> [   19.879182]  ? do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80
> [   19.879700]  ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
> [   19.880413]  </TASK>
> [   19.880806] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [   19.881502] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 872 at block/genhd.c:543 
> device_add_disk+0x2af/0x5d0
> [   19.882695] Modules linked in: nbd(+)
> [   19.883290] CPU: 1 PID: 872 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 
> 5.15.0-rc6-next-20211020-00001-g2f1
> [   19.884823] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), 
> BIOS ?-20190727_0738364
> [   19.886866] RIP: 0010:device_add_disk+0x2af/0x5d0
> [   19.887606] Code: 6e f2 f2 0b 01 49 8b 76 48 48 8b 3d db 03 f3 0b e8 
> f6 ec a9 ff 48 83 050
> [   19.890456] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000e47c70 EFLAGS: 00010202
> [   19.891293] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 
> 00000000000ae001
> [   19.892274] RDX: 00000000000ac001 RSI: ffffffff91b5906b RDI: 
> 0000000000000000
> [   19.893318] RBP: ffff8881034ad600 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 
> ffffffff915e2e69
> [   19.894425] R10: 0000000000000014 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 
> 00000000ffffffef
> [   19.895544] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff88817d720600 R15: 
> ffff88817d720648
> [   19.896652] FS:  00007fc08c7a7040(0000) GS:ffff88882f640000(0000) 
> knlGS:0000000000000000
> [   19.897902] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [   19.898768] CR2: 00007fc08bcf0395 CR3: 000000017c467000 CR4: 
> 00000000000006e0
> [   19.899754] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 
> 0000000000000000
> [   19.900856] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 
> 0000000000000400
> [   19.901989] Call Trace:
> [   19.902387]  <TASK>
> [   19.902732]  nbd_dev_add+0x30e/0x470 [nbd]
> [   19.903395]  ? 0xffffffffc0060000
> [   19.903917]  nbd_init+0x1dc/0x1000 [nbd]
> [   19.904536]  do_one_initcall+0x71/0x3a0
> [   19.905166]  ? gcov_event+0x70/0x690
> [   19.905745]  do_init_module+0xa6/0x350
> [   19.906351]  load_module+0x2587/0x2720
> [   19.906932]  ? kernel_read+0x31/0xb0
> [   19.907509]  ? kernel_read_file+0x15a/0x360
> [   19.908195]  ? __do_sys_finit_module+0xe5/0x190
> [   19.908894]  __do_sys_finit_module+0xe5/0x190
> [   19.909591]  __x64_sys_finit_module+0x1e/0x30
> [   19.910289]  do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80
> [   19.910855]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
> [   19.911652] RIP: 0033:0x7fc08bc7a4e9
> [   19.912231] Code: 00 f3 c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 
> 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 488
> [   19.915026] RSP: 002b:00007fff0ddf6fd8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 
> 0000000000000139
> [   19.916080] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005596400853e0 RCX: 
> 00007fc08bc7a4e9
> [   19.917180] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000055963fe1bc26 RDI: 
> 0000000000000003
> [   19.918302] RBP: 000055963fe1bc26 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 
> 0000000000000000
> [   19.919412] R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 
> 0000000000000000
> [   19.920524] R13: 00005596400854f0 R14: 0000000000040000 R15: 
> 00005596400853e0
> [   19.921629]  </TASK>
> [   19.922005] ---[ end trace e09ecf130812479d ]---
>
> Thanks,
> Kuai
> > Hi, Pavel
> >
> > Thanks for your response, with the root cause fixed, patch 1 is not
> > needed anymore. However, the overflow case in patch 2 is still
> > possible.
> >
> > Does anyone plan to remove the checking?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kuai
> > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211011073556.GA10735@xxxxxx/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > With regards,
> > > Pavel Skripkin
> > > .