Re: [PATCH v2] uapi: futex: Add a futex syscall
From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Mon Oct 25 2021 - 13:33:10 EST
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 6:33 PM André Almeida <andrealmeid@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Às 02:54 de 21/10/21, Alistair Francis escreveu:
> > From: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xxxxxxx>
> > +#if defined(__NR_futex)
> > + if (sizeof(*timeout) == sizeof(struct __kernel_old_timespec))
> > + return syscall(__NR_futex, uaddr, op, val, timeout, uaddr2, val3);
> > +
> > + if (timeout && timeout->tv_sec == (long)timeout->tv_sec) {
> > + struct __kernel_old_timespec ts32;
> > +
> > + ts32.tv_sec = (__kernel_long_t) timeout->tv_sec;> + ts32.tv_nsec = (__kernel_long_t) timeout->tv_nsec;
> > +
> > + return syscall(__NR_futex, uaddr, op, val, &ts32, uaddr2, val3);
> > + } else if (!timeout) {
> > + return syscall(__NR_futex, uaddr, op, val, NULL, uaddr2, val3);
> > + }
> > +#endif
>
> If I read this part right, you will always use ts32 for __NR_futex. I
> know that it can be misleading, but __NR_futex uses ts64 in 64-bit
> archs, so they shouldn't be converted to ts32 in those cases.
__kernel_old_timespec is the correct type for sys_futex() on all
architectures.
Maybe name the local variable 'ts' or 'ts_old' instead of 'ts32' then?
> > +{
> > +#if defined(__NR_futex_time64)
> > + int ret = syscall(__NR_futex_time64, uaddr, op, val, nr_requeue, uaddr2, val3);
> > +
> > + if (ret == 0 || errno != ENOSYS)
> > + return ret;
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +#if defined(__NR_futex)
> > + return syscall(__NR_futex, uaddr, op, val, nr_requeue, uaddr2, val3);
> > +#endif
> > +
> > + errno = ENOSYS;
> > + return -1;
> > +}
> > +
> > +#endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_FUTEX_SYSCALL_H */
> >
>
> Sorry if this question was already asked but I didn't find it in the
> thread: Should we go with wrappers for the most common op? Like:
>
> __kernel_futex_wait(volatile uint32_t *uaddr, uint32_t val, struct
> timespec *timeout)
>
> __kernel_futex_wake(volatile uint32_t *uaddr, uint32_t nr_wake)
I had suggested having just a single function definition here, but having one
per argument type seems reasonable as well. Having one definition
per futex_op value would also be possible, but in that case I suppose
we need all 13 of them, not just two.
Arnd