[PATCH 5.14 114/169] KVM: x86: split the two parts of emulator_pio_in

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 3b27de27183911d461afedf50c6fa30c59740c07 upstream.

emulator_pio_in handles both the case where the data is pending in
vcpu->arch.pio.count, and the case where I/O has to be done via either
an in-kernel device or a userspace exit.  For SEV-ES we would like
to split these, to identify clearly the moment at which the
sev_pio_data is consumed.  To this end, create two different
functions: __emulator_pio_in fills in vcpu->arch.pio.count, while
complete_emulator_pio_in clears it and releases vcpu->arch.pio.data.

Because this patch has to be backported, things are left a bit messy.
kernel_pio() operates on vcpu->arch.pio, which leads to emulator_pio_in()
having with two calls to complete_emulator_pio_in().  It will be fixed
in the next release.

While at it, remove the unused void* val argument of emulator_pio_in_out.
The function currently hardcodes vcpu->arch.pio_data as the
source/destination buffer, which sucks but will be fixed after the more
severe SEV-ES buffer overflow.

No functional change intended.

Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 7ed9abfe8e9f ("KVM: SVM: Support string IO operations for an SEV-ES guest")
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c |   45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -6907,7 +6907,7 @@ static int kernel_pio(struct kvm_vcpu *v
 }
 
 static int emulator_pio_in_out(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int size,
-			       unsigned short port, void *val,
+			       unsigned short port,
 			       unsigned int count, bool in)
 {
 	vcpu->arch.pio.port = port;
@@ -6928,26 +6928,38 @@ static int emulator_pio_in_out(struct kv
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int emulator_pio_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int size,
-			   unsigned short port, void *val, unsigned int count)
+static int __emulator_pio_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int size,
+			     unsigned short port, unsigned int count)
 {
-	int ret;
+	WARN_ON(vcpu->arch.pio.count);
+	memset(vcpu->arch.pio_data, 0, size * count);
+	return emulator_pio_in_out(vcpu, size, port, count, true);
+}
 
-	if (vcpu->arch.pio.count)
-		goto data_avail;
+static void complete_emulator_pio_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int size,
+				    unsigned short port, void *val)
+{
+	memcpy(val, vcpu->arch.pio_data, size * vcpu->arch.pio.count);
+	trace_kvm_pio(KVM_PIO_IN, port, size, vcpu->arch.pio.count, vcpu->arch.pio_data);
+	vcpu->arch.pio.count = 0;
+}
 
-	memset(vcpu->arch.pio_data, 0, size * count);
+static int emulator_pio_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int size,
+			   unsigned short port, void *val, unsigned int count)
+{
+	if (vcpu->arch.pio.count) {
+		/* Complete previous iteration.  */
+	} else {
+		int r = __emulator_pio_in(vcpu, size, port, count);
+		if (!r)
+			return r;
 
-	ret = emulator_pio_in_out(vcpu, size, port, val, count, true);
-	if (ret) {
-data_avail:
-		memcpy(val, vcpu->arch.pio_data, size * count);
-		trace_kvm_pio(KVM_PIO_IN, port, size, count, vcpu->arch.pio_data);
-		vcpu->arch.pio.count = 0;
-		return 1;
+		/* Results already available, fall through.  */
 	}
 
-	return 0;
+	WARN_ON(count != vcpu->arch.pio.count);
+	complete_emulator_pio_in(vcpu, size, port, val);
+	return 1;
 }
 
 static int emulator_pio_in_emulated(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
@@ -6966,12 +6978,11 @@ static int emulator_pio_out(struct kvm_v
 
 	memcpy(vcpu->arch.pio_data, val, size * count);
 	trace_kvm_pio(KVM_PIO_OUT, port, size, count, vcpu->arch.pio_data);
-	ret = emulator_pio_in_out(vcpu, size, port, (void *)val, count, false);
+	ret = emulator_pio_in_out(vcpu, size, port, count, false);
 	if (ret)
                 vcpu->arch.pio.count = 0;
 
         return ret;
-
 }
 
 static int emulator_pio_out_emulated(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,