[PATCH 2/2] KVM: selftests: Add test to verify KVM doesn't explode on "bad" I/O

[Sean Christopherson]

Add an x86 selftest to verify that KVM doesn't WARN or otherwise explode
if userspace modifies RCX during a userspace exit to handle string I/O.
This is a regression test for a user-triggerable WARN introduced by
commit 3b27de271839 ("KVM: x86: split the two parts of emulator_pio_in").

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore        |   1 +
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile          |   1 +
 .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/userspace_io_test.c  | 114 ++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 116 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/userspace_io_test.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore
index b8dbabe24ac2..691262c7b122 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
 /x86_64/svm_int_ctl_test
 /x86_64/sync_regs_test
 /x86_64/tsc_msrs_test
+/x86_64/userspace_io_test
 /x86_64/userspace_msr_exit_test
 /x86_64/vmx_apic_access_test
 /x86_64/vmx_close_while_nested_test
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
index d1774f461393..1a611cb80c4e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/vmx_preemption_timer_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/svm_vmcall_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/svm_int_ctl_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/sync_regs_test
+TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/userspace_io_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/userspace_msr_exit_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/vmx_apic_access_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/vmx_close_while_nested_test
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/userspace_io_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/userspace_io_test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e4bef2e05686
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/userspace_io_test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <fcntl.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <sys/ioctl.h>
+
+#include "test_util.h"
+
+#include "kvm_util.h"
+#include "processor.h"
+
+#define VCPU_ID			1
+
+static void guest_ins_port80(uint8_t *buffer, unsigned int count)
+{
+	unsigned long end;
+
+	if (count == 2)
+		end = (unsigned long)buffer + 1;
+	else
+		end = (unsigned long)buffer + 8192;
+
+	asm volatile("cld; rep; insb" : "+D"(buffer), "+c"(count) : "d"(0x80) : "memory");
+	GUEST_ASSERT_1(count == 0, count);
+	GUEST_ASSERT_2((unsigned long)buffer == end, buffer, end);
+}
+
+static void guest_code(void)
+{
+	uint8_t buffer[8192];
+	int i;
+
+	/*
+	 * Special case tests.  main() will adjust RCX 2 => 1 and 3 => 8192 to
+	 * test that KVM doesn't explode when userspace modifies the "count" on
+	 * a userspace I/O exit.  KVM isn't required to play nice with the I/O
+	 * itself as KVM doesn't support manipulating the count, it just needs
+	 * to not explode or overflow a buffer.
+	 */
+	guest_ins_port80(buffer, 2);
+	guest_ins_port80(buffer, 3);
+
+	/* Verify KVM fills the buffer correctly when not stuffing RCX. */
+	memset(buffer, 0, sizeof(buffer));
+	guest_ins_port80(buffer, 8192);
+	for (i = 0; i < 8192; i++)
+		GUEST_ASSERT_2(buffer[i] == 0xaa, i, buffer[i]);
+
+	GUEST_DONE();
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+	struct kvm_regs regs;
+	struct kvm_run *run;
+	struct kvm_vm *vm;
+	struct ucall uc;
+	int rc;
+
+	/* Tell stdout not to buffer its content */
+	setbuf(stdout, NULL);
+
+	/* Create VM */
+	vm = vm_create_default(VCPU_ID, 0, guest_code);
+	run = vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID);
+
+	memset(&regs, 0, sizeof(regs));
+
+	while (1) {
+		rc = _vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID);
+
+		TEST_ASSERT(rc == 0, "vcpu_run failed: %d\n", rc);
+		TEST_ASSERT(run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_IO,
+			    "Unexpected exit reason: %u (%s),\n",
+			    run->exit_reason,
+			    exit_reason_str(run->exit_reason));
+
+		if (get_ucall(vm, VCPU_ID, &uc))
+			break;
+
+		TEST_ASSERT(run->io.port == 0x80,
+			    "Expected I/O at port 0x80, got port 0x%x\n", run->io.port);
+
+		/*
+		 * Modify the rep string count in RCX: 2 => 1 and 3 => 8192.
+		 * Note, this abuses KVM's batching of rep string I/O to avoid
+		 * getting stuck in an infinite loop.  That behavior isn't in
+		 * scope from a testing perspective as it's not ABI in any way,
+		 * i.e. it really is abusing internal KVM knowledge.
+		 */
+		vcpu_regs_get(vm, VCPU_ID, &regs);
+		if (regs.rcx == 2)
+			regs.rcx = 1;
+		if (regs.rcx == 3)
+			regs.rcx = 8192;
+		memset((void *)run + run->io.data_offset, 0xaa, 4096);
+		vcpu_regs_set(vm, VCPU_ID, &regs);
+	}
+
+	switch (uc.cmd) {
+	case UCALL_DONE:
+		break;
+	case UCALL_ABORT:
+		TEST_FAIL("%s at %s:%ld : argN+1 = 0x%lx, argN+2 = 0x%lx",
+			  (const char *)uc.args[0], __FILE__, uc.args[1],
+			  uc.args[2], uc.args[3]);
+	default:
+		TEST_FAIL("Unknown ucall %lu", uc.cmd);
+	}
+
+	kvm_vm_free(vm);
+	return 0;
+}
-- 
2.33.0.1079.g6e70778dc9-goog