Re: [PATCH] ipmi: ssif: Add msleep in multipart test
From: Corey Minyard
Date: Tue Oct 26 2021 - 12:50:19 EST
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 10:58:34AM +0800, Kunkun Li wrote:
> During multipart test, cmd(6,7,8) or cmd(6,7,7) will
> be sent continuously.
This is not useful information, we don't have access to your tests, so
this is meaningless to us.
>
> The pressure test found some BMC systems cannot process
> messages in time, resulting in read_response continues to receive
> error messages from i2c.
> Retry mechanism will takes 10s, and finally set not support
> multipart transmit.
>
> So, to work around this,add msleep after sending cmd 6 and
> cmd 7 respectively. The problem did not appear again in
> pressure test.
No, you can't slow down everyone because you have one dodgy BMC. You
need to detect that this is a BMC that has the problem and only do it
for those BMCs.
-corey
>
> Signed-off-by: Kunkun Li <likunkun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c
> index 20d5af92966d..65841798fafe 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c
> @@ -1453,6 +1453,7 @@ static int start_multipart_test(struct i2c_client *client,
> ret = i2c_smbus_write_block_data(client,
> SSIF_IPMI_MULTI_PART_REQUEST_START,
> 32, msg);
> + msleep(SSIF_MSG_MSEC);
> if (ret) {
> retry_cnt--;
> if (retry_cnt > 0)
> @@ -1467,6 +1468,7 @@ static int start_multipart_test(struct i2c_client *client,
> ret = i2c_smbus_write_block_data(client,
> SSIF_IPMI_MULTI_PART_REQUEST_MIDDLE,
> 32, msg + 32);
> + msleep(SSIF_MSG_MSEC);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(&client->dev, "Could not write multi-part middle, though the BMC said it could handle it. Just limit sends to one part.\n");
> return ret;
> --
> 2.11.0
>