Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] x86: Rewrite the retpoline rewrite logic

[Alexei Starovoitov]

On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 11:45 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 11:26:57AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>
> > It's a merge conflict. The patchset failed to apply to both bpf and
> > bpf-next trees:
>
> Figures :/ I suspect it relies on tip/objtool/core at the very least and
> possibly some of the x86 trees as well.
>
> I can locally merge tip/master with bpf, but getting a CI to do that
> might be tricky.

We have an ability in CI to supply few additional patches on top bpf/bpf-next
trees, but that's usually done for the cases where we've merged a fix into
one tree, but it's needed in both while bpf->net->linus->net-next->bpf-next
circle is still pending.

Does tip/objtool/core dependency relevant for this set?
Can you rebase the current set on top of bpf-next and send it to the list
just to get CI to run it? We won't be merging it into bpf-next, of course.
I'm mainly interested in seeing all that additional tests passing that
we have in bpf-next.