Re: [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/book3e: Fix set_memory_x() and set_memory_nx()

[Nicholas Piggin]

Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of October 27, 2021 3:50 pm:
> 
> 
> Le 27/10/2021 à 07:27, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
>> Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of October 27, 2021 2:55 pm:
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 27/10/2021 à 06:44, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
>>>> Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of October 26, 2021 3:39 pm:
>>>>> set_memory_x() calls pte_mkexec() which sets _PAGE_EXEC.
>>>>> set_memory_nx() calls pte_exprotec() which clears _PAGE_EXEC.
>>>>>
>>>>> Book3e has 2 bits, UX and SX, which defines the exec rights
>>>>> resp. for user (PR=1) and for kernel (PR=0).
>>>>>
>>>>> _PAGE_EXEC is defined as UX only.
>>>>>
>>>>> An executable kernel page is set with either _PAGE_KERNEL_RWX
>>>>> or _PAGE_KERNEL_ROX, which both have SX set and UX cleared.
>>>>>
>>>>> So set_memory_nx() call for an executable kernel page does
>>>>> nothing because UX is already cleared.
>>>>>
>>>>> And set_memory_x() on a non-executable kernel page makes it
>>>>> executable for the user and keeps it non-executable for kernel.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, pte_exec() always returns 'false' on kernel pages, because
>>>>> it checks _PAGE_EXEC which doesn't include SX, so for instance
>>>>> the W+X check doesn't work.
>>>>>
>>>>> To fix this:
>>>>> - change tlb_low_64e.S to use _PAGE_BAP_UX instead of _PAGE_USER
>>>>> - sets both UX and SX in _PAGE_EXEC so that pte_user() returns
>>>>> true whenever one of the two bits is set
>>>>
>>>> I don't understand this change. Which pte_user() returns true after
>>>> this change? Or do you mean pte_exec()?
>>>
>>> Oops, yes, I mean pte_exec()
>>>
>>> Unless I have to re-spin, can Michael eventually fix that typo while
>>> applying ?
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Does this filter through in some cases at least for kernel executable
>>>> PTEs will get both bits set? Seems cleaner to distinguish user and
>>>> kernel exec for that but maybe it's a lot of churn?
>>>
>>> Didn't understand what you mean.
>>>
>>> I did it like that to be able to continue using _PAGE_EXEC for checking
>>> executability regardless of whether this is user or kernel, and then
>>> continue using the generic nohash pte_exec() helper.
>>>
>>> Other solution would be to get rid of _PAGE_EXEC completely for book3e
>>> and implement both pte_exec() and pte_mkexec() with _PAGE_BAP_UX and
>>> _PAGE_BAP_SX, but I'm not sure it is worth the churn as you say. It
>>> would also mean different helpers for book3s/32 when it is using 32 bits
>>> PTE (CONFIG_PTE_64BIT=n)
>> 
>> That's basically what I mean. And _PAGE_KERNEL_ROX etc would then not
>> set the UX bit. But at least for now it seems to be an improvement.
>> 
> 
> That's already the case:
> 
> #define _PAGE_KERNEL_RWX	(_PAGE_BAP_SW | _PAGE_BAP_SR | _PAGE_DIRTY | 
> _PAGE_BAP_SX)
> #define _PAGE_KERNEL_ROX	(_PAGE_BAP_SR | _PAGE_BAP_SX)

So it is, I was looking at the wrong header.

Looks okay to me then, for what it's worth.

Thanks,
Nick