Re: [PATCH] video: fbdev: cirrusfb: check pixclock to avoid divide by zero
From: George Kennedy
Date: Wed Oct 27 2021 - 11:22:34 EST
On 10/27/2021 2:53 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi George,
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 3:13 AM George Kennedy
<george.kennedy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/26/2021 1:12 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 5:48 PM George Kennedy
<george.kennedy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/26/2021 10:11 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 3:38 PM George Kennedy
<george.kennedy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/26/2021 4:30 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 9:37 PM George Kennedy
<george.kennedy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/25/2021 3:07 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 02:01:30PM -0500, George Kennedy wrote:
Do a sanity check on pixclock value before using it as a divisor.
Syzkaller reported a divide error in cirrusfb_check_pixclock.
divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 0 PID: 14938 Comm: cirrusfb_test Not tainted 5.15.0-rc6 #1
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2
RIP: 0010:cirrusfb_check_var+0x6f1/0x1260
Call Trace:
fb_set_var+0x398/0xf90
do_fb_ioctl+0x4b8/0x6f0
fb_ioctl+0xeb/0x130
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x19d/0x220
do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
Signed-off-by: George Kennedy <george.kennedy@xxxxxxxxxx>
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/cirrusfb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/cirrusfb.c
@@ -477,6 +477,9 @@ static int cirrusfb_check_pixclock(const struct fb_var_screeninfo *var,
struct cirrusfb_info *cinfo = info->par;
unsigned maxclockidx = var->bits_per_pixel >> 3;
+ if (!var->pixclock)
+ return -EINVAL;
This is not correct: fbdev drivers should round up invalid values,
and only return an error if rounding up cannot yield a valid value.
What default value would you recommend? Here are examples of some of the
possible cirrusfb pixclock values:
40000: 25MHz
20000: 50Mhz
12500: 80Mhz
You should pick the lowest supported value.
In bestclock() the frequency value ("freq") is not allowed to go below 8000.
if (freq < 8000)
freq = 8000;
If pixclock is passed in as zero to cirrusfb_check_pixclock(), is it ok
to then set the value of pixclock to 125000, which will result in "freq"
being set to 8000 (or adjust the passed in pixclock value to make sure
"freq" does not get below 8000)?
No, clock rate is the inverse of clock period.
So the smallest clock period (fb_var_screeninfo.pixclock) corresponds
to the largest clock rate (freq in bestclock()).
How about this?
This gets the frequency derived from pixclock to maxclock or rounds up
pixclock to get the frequency as close to maxclock as possible.
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/cirrusfb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/cirrusfb.c
index 93802ab..2e8e620 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/cirrusfb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/cirrusfb.c
@@ -620,6 +620,18 @@ static int cirrusfb_check_var(struct
fb_var_screeninfo *var,
return -EINVAL;
}
+ if (!var->pixclock) {
+ long maxclock;
+ unsigned maxclockidx = var->bits_per_pixel >> 3;
+
+ maxclock =
cirrusfb_board_info[cinfo->btype].maxclock[maxclockidx];
+
+ var->pixclock = KHZ2PICOS(maxclock);
+ while (PICOS2KHZ(var->pixclock) > maxclock) {
+ var->pixclock++;
+ }
+ }
+
if (cirrusfb_check_pixclock(var, info))
return -EINVAL;
The work can't be done in cirrusfb_check_pixclock() as var->pixclock is
read-only because "var" is "const struct fb_var_screeninfo *var".
Perhaps the const should be dropped from the var parameter, so the
rounding can be done in the function where it makes most sense,
and where most of the above operations are already done?
Then, you can simplify:
- freq = PICOS2KHZ(var->pixclock);
+ freq = PICOS2KHZ(var->pixclock ? : 1);
and change the "if (freq > maxclock) return -EINVAL" to use maxclock
instead.
Geert,
Does this look ok?
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/cirrusfb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/cirrusfb.c
index 93802ab..3d47c34 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/cirrusfb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/cirrusfb.c
@@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ static int cirrusfb_check_mclk(struct fb_info *info,
long freq)
return 0;
}
-static int cirrusfb_check_pixclock(const struct fb_var_screeninfo *var,
+static int cirrusfb_check_pixclock(struct fb_var_screeninfo *var,
struct fb_info *info)
{
long freq;
@@ -478,9 +478,7 @@ static int cirrusfb_check_pixclock(const struct
fb_var_screeninfo *var,
unsigned maxclockidx = var->bits_per_pixel >> 3;
/* convert from ps to kHz */
- freq = PICOS2KHZ(var->pixclock);
-
- dev_dbg(info->device, "desired pixclock: %ld kHz\n", freq);
+ freq = PICOS2KHZ(var->pixclock ? : 1);
maxclock = cirrusfb_board_info[cinfo->btype].maxclock[maxclockidx];
cinfo->multiplexing = 0;
@@ -488,11 +486,13 @@ static int cirrusfb_check_pixclock(const struct
fb_var_screeninfo *var,
/* If the frequency is greater than we can support, we might be
able
* to use multiplexing for the video mode */
if (freq > maxclock) {
- dev_err(info->device,
- "Frequency greater than maxclock (%ld kHz)\n",
- maxclock);
- return -EINVAL;
+ var->pixclock = KHZ2PICOS(maxclock);
+
+ while ((freq = PICOS2KHZ(var->pixclock)) > maxclock)
+ var->pixclock++;
}
+ dev_dbg(info->device, "desired pixclock: %ld kHz\n", freq);
+
/*
* Additional constraint: 8bpp uses DAC clock doubling to allow
maximum
* pixel clock
Is the pixclock round-up still needed? Without it the frequency may be
slightly above maxclock in some cases.
Thank you,
George
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds