Re: [PATCH 2/5 v3] sh: add git tree to MAINTAINERS
From: Rich Felker
Date: Thu Oct 28 2021 - 09:30:57 EST
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 10:33:54AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Rich,
>
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 10:54 PM Rich Felker <dalias@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 05:19:11PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > Add the git tree location for linux-sh.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> > > --- linux-next-20211001.orig/MAINTAINERS
> > > +++ linux-next-20211001/MAINTAINERS
> > > @@ -18047,6 +18047,7 @@ M: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourcefor
> > > M: Rich Felker <dalias@xxxxxxxx>
> > > L: linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > S: Maintained
> > > +T: git git://git.libc.org/linux-sh
> > > Q: http://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-sh/list/
> > > F: Documentation/sh/
> > > F: arch/sh/
> >
> > I'm omitting this for now since (as noted on the cgit description)
> > this server is not provisioned adequately for cloning from scratch,
> > and should only be used for fetch into an already-populated mainline
> > repo clone. If that's a problem I can see about getting it moved
> > somewhere more appropriate.
>
> Perhaps you can move it to kernel.org?
I would love to. This was my hope years ago, but I got bogged down in
the GPG key signing requirements and folks not following through with
signing my key. Has any of that been streamlined since?
> > The rest of this series should appear in next shortly.
>
> Thanks a lot!
Looks like it's been pulled by next now with no reports of anything
going wrong. I know it's late in the release cycle but should I
probably go ahead and send a PR?
Rich