Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: ralink: include 'ralink_regs.h' in 'pinctrl-mt7620.c'

From: Sergio Paracuellos
Date: Sun Oct 31 2021 - 09:42:58 EST


Hi Andy,

On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 2:08 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 8:41 AM Sergio Paracuellos
> <sergio.paracuellos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > mt7620.h, included by pinctrl-mt7620.c, mentions MT762X_SOC_MT7628AN
> > declared in ralink_regs.h.
> >
> > Fixes: 745ec436de72 ("pinctrl: ralink: move MT7620 SoC pinmux config into a new 'pinctrl-mt7620.c' file")
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Tag blocks mustn't have blank lines.

Ok, thanks for letting me know.

>
> ...
>
> > +#include <asm/mach-ralink/ralink_regs.h>
> > #include <asm/mach-ralink/mt7620.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>
> Actually the rule of thumb is to start from more generic definitions /
> inclusions to more particular. Thus, asm/* usually goes after linux/*.
> Any Specific reason why here is not the case?

I just respect the order that was already in the files, I guess when I
moved all of this from arch/mips into drivers/pinctrl. All files
inside follows the same order.

Best regards,
Sergio Paracuellos
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko