At first, I guess the robot just checks the "[number]" instead
TAP version 13
1..1
# selftests: ftrace: ftracetest
# === Ftrace unit tests ===
# [1] Basic trace file check [PASS]
...
<<< [1] - [67] have same results as parent, i.e. both PASS or both FAIL >>>
of the test description, but the ftracetest doesn't fix the "[number]"
for each test, Thus, it can be different when updated it.
So if you compare the result, please check the descriptions too.
...And next, some patch series may *ADD* new testcases if the series add
# [67] event trigger - test multiple actions on hist trigger [PASS]
# [68] event trigger - test inter-event histogram trigger onchange action [FAIL][68] - [72] can PASS on parent
# [69] event trigger - test inter-event histogram trigger onmatch action [FAIL]
# [70] event trigger - test inter-event histogram trigger onmatch-onmax action [FAIL]
# [71] event trigger - test inter-event histogram trigger onmax action [FAIL]
# [72] event trigger - test inter-event histogram trigger snapshot action [FAIL]
# [73] event trigger - test inter-event histogram trigger eprobe on synthetic event [FAIL][73] fail on parent, too
# [74] event trigger - test synthetic event create remove [FAIL][74] - [92] can PASS on parent
# [75] event trigger - test inter-event histogram trigger trace action with dynamic string param [FAIL]
# [76] event trigger - test synthetic_events syntax parser [FAIL]
# [77] event trigger - test synthetic_events syntax parser errors [FAIL]
# [78] event trigger - test inter-event histogram trigger trace action [FAIL]
# [79] event trigger - test event enable/disable trigger [FAIL]
# [80] event trigger - test trigger filter [FAIL]
# [81] event trigger - test histogram expression parsing [FAIL]
# [82] event trigger - test histogram modifiers [FAIL]
# [83] event trigger - test histogram parser errors [FAIL]
# [84] event trigger - test histogram trigger [FAIL]
# [85] event trigger - test multiple histogram triggers [FAIL]
# [86] event trigger - test snapshot-trigger [FAIL]
# [87] event trigger - test stacktrace-trigger [FAIL]
# [88] trace_marker trigger - test histogram trigger [FAIL]
# [89] trace_marker trigger - test snapshot trigger [FAIL]
# [90] trace_marker trigger - test histogram with synthetic event against kernel event [FAIL]
# [91] trace_marker trigger - test histogram with synthetic event [FAIL]
# [92] event trigger - test traceon/off trigger [FAIL]
# [93] (instance) Basic test for tracers [PASS]
...
<<< [93] - [112] have same results as parent, all PASS >>>
...
# [112] (instance) trace_marker trigger - test histogram trigger [PASS]
# [113] (instance) trace_marker trigger - test snapshot trigger [PASS]parent has no [113]
a new feature, so if you find the difference which is not in the
parent commit but it is passed, please ignore that.
# tac: failed to create temporary file in '/tmp/ftracetest-dir.o54lNh': No such file or directoryAnd if you find this kind of new error message like above, please report it.
# tac: failed to create temporary file in '/tmp/ftracetest-dir.o54lNh': No such file or directory
# tac: failed to create temporary file in '/tmp/ftracetest-dir.o54lNh': No such file or directory
# tac: failed to create temporary file in '/tmp/ftracetest-dir.o54lNh': No such file or directory
This is more important for us.
#Also, please configure your running environment correctly so that all
#
# # of passed: 85
# # of failed: 26
# # of unresolved: 1
# # of untested: 0
# # of unsupported: 0
# # of xfailed: 1
# # of undefined(test bug): 0
not ok 1 selftests: ftrace: ftracetest # exit=1
ftracetest passes. If you unsure how to do, please ask me.
Thank you,
To reproduce:
git clone https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git
cd lkp-tests
sudo bin/lkp install job.yaml # job file is attached in this email
bin/lkp split-job --compatible job.yaml # generate the yaml file for lkp run
sudo bin/lkp run generated-yaml-file
# if come across any failure that blocks the test,
# please remove ~/.lkp and /lkp dir to run from a clean state.
---
0DAY/LKP+ Test Infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/lkp@xxxxxxxxxxxx Intel Corporation
Thanks,
Oliver Sang