Re: [PATCH 0/6] MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() support for the ISHTP bus

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 11/1/21 11:12, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> On 2021-11-01 10:56+0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> On 10/29/21 17:28, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
>>> Currently as soon as any ISHTP device appears all available ISHTP device
>>> drivers are loaded automatically.
>>> This series extends the MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() functionality to properly handle
>>> the ishtp bus and switches the drivers over to use it.
>>>
>>> Patch 1 adds the infrastructure to handle ishtp devices via MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE()
>>> Patch 2 replaces some inlined constants with ones now defined by mod_devicetable.h
>>> Patches 3-6 migrate all ishtp drivers to MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE()
>>>
>>> Note: This patchset is based on the pdx86/for-next tree because that contains
>>> one of the drivers that is not yet in the other trees.
>>
>> Since most of the changes here are under drivers/hid and since the latter
>> patches depend on 1/6, I believe it would be best to merge the entire series
>> through the HID tree, here is my ack for this:
>>
>> Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Please note that patch 6 modifies a driver that is not yet available in the HID
> and 5.15 trees but only in pdx86/for-next.

Right, but given where we are in the cycle this is going to be something to
merge post 5.16-rc1 anyways which resolves the dependency issue.

I guess it might be good to send this our in a later pull-req as a fix series
for a later 5.16-rc# though, to avoid the eclite and chrome-ec drivers from
autoloading on all systems with an ISH, even though they usually will not be
used there.

Regards,

Hans