Re: [PATCH v2] staging: vc04_services: replace msleep() by usleep_range()
From: Dan Carpenter
Date: Wed Nov 03 2021 - 06:49:33 EST
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 02:33:57PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 17 Oct 2021, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am 17.10.21 um 11:29 schrieb Kushal-kothari:
> > > Fixed the warning:-msleep < 20ms can sleep for up to 20ms by replacing
> > > msleep(unsigned long msecs) by usleep_range(unsigned long min, unsigned long max)
> > > in usecs as msleep(1ms~20ms) can sleep for upto 20 ms.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Kushal-kothari <kushalkothari285@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Changes from v1: Reword both the subject and the log message.
> > >
> > > drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c | 4 ++--
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
> > > index 6fbafdfe340f..80a7898c5331 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
> > > @@ -857,7 +857,7 @@ vchiq_bulk_transmit(unsigned int handle, const void *data, unsigned int size,
> > > if (status != VCHIQ_RETRY)
> > > break;
> > >
> > > - msleep(1);
> > > + usleep_range(1000, 2000);
> >
> > there was a recent discussion about this checkpatch warning [1]
>
> Should there be a comment about it?
Even better would be an alternate wrapper around usleep(1) which would
silence the checkpatch warning. Something like:
#define short_sleep() usleep(1)
regards,
dan carpenter