Re: [PATCH v2] dma-direct: improve DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING

[Ard Biesheuvel]

On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 at 09:53, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 10:32:21AM +0800, Walter Wu wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/set_memory.h b/include/linux/set_memory.h
> > index f36be5166c19..6c7d1683339c 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/set_memory.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/set_memory.h
> > @@ -7,11 +7,16 @@
> >
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SET_MEMORY
> >  #include <asm/set_memory.h>
> > +
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_RODATA_FULL_DEFAULT_ENABLED
>
> This is an arm64-specific symbol, and one that only controls a
> default.  I don't think it is suitable to key off stubs in common
> code.
>
> > +static inline int set_memory_valid(unsigned long addr, int numpages, int enable) { return 0; }
>
> Pleae avoid overly long lines.
>
> > +             if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RODATA_FULL_DEFAULT_ENABLED)) {
> > +                     kaddr = (unsigned long)phys_to_virt(dma_to_phys(dev, *dma_handle));
>
> This can just use page_address.
>
> > +                     /* page remove kernel mapping for arm64 */
> > +                     set_memory_valid(kaddr, size >> PAGE_SHIFT, 0);
> > +             }
>
> But more importantly:  set_memory_valid only exists on arm64, this
> will break compile everywhere else.  And this API is complete crap.
> Passing kernel virtual addresses as unsigned long just sucks, and
> passing an integer argument for valid/non-valid also is a horrible
> API.
>

... and as I pointed out before, you can still pass rodata=off on
arm64, and get the old behavior, in which case bad things will happen
if you try to use an API that expects to operate on page mappings with
a 1 GB block mapping.

And you still haven't explained what the actual problem is: is this
about CPU speculation corrupting non-cache coherent inbound DMA?