Re: [PATCH] tty: vt: keyboard: do not copy an extra-byte in copy_to_user

[Pavel Skripkin]

On 11/6/21 23:44, Ajay Garg wrote:
> > >
> > > That's the whole point of the discussion :)
> > >
> > > The method "vt_do_kdgkb_ioctl" does not manage "func_table[kb_func]".
> > > Thus, the method does not know whether or not
> > > strlen(func_table[kb_func]) < sizeof(user_kdgkb->kb_string).
> > >
> >
> > It manages. The code under `case KDSKBSENT:` sets func_table[] entries
> > via vt_kdskbsent().
> >
> > kbs = strndup_user(..., sizeof(user_kdgkb->kb_string));
> >
> > is used to allocate buffer for the func_table[] entry. That's my main
> > point :)
>
> func_table is set in vt_kdskbent, which itself is external.
>
> More importantly, vt_kdskbent is handled in case KDSKBSENT:, while the
> strlcpy issue we are dealing with is in case KDGKBSENT:
> In case KDGKBSENT, following are managed :
>
>                  ssize_t len = sizeof(user_kdgkb->kb_string);
>                  kbs = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> while func_table[kb_func] is external entity here, so no assumption
> ought to be made for it, just my 2 cents though :)
>
> Anyhow, really, it is the maintainers' choice now :), since there
> isn't a burning (compilation/runtime) issue.

I fully agree here, it's maintainer's choice. Let's sit down and wait 
what experienced people thing about this :)

I've just wanted to explain my idea better to exclude possible 
misunderstanding.

Thanks



With regards,
Pavel Skripkin