Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] libperf: Add processing to scale the counters obtained during the read() system call when multiplexing

[nakamura.shun@xxxxxxxxxxx]

Hi Jirka

> > > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 07:16:26PM +0900, Shunsuke Nakamura wrote:
> > > > > From: nakamura shunsuke <nakamura.shun@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > 
> > > > > perf_evsel__read() scales counters obtained by RDPMC during multiplexing, but
> > > > > does not scale counters obtained by read() system call.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Add processing to perf_evsel__read() to scale the counters obtained during the
> > > > > read() system call when multiplexing.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Shunsuke Nakamura <nakamura.shun@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  tools/lib/perf/evsel.c | 6 ++++++
> > > > >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/evsel.c b/tools/lib/perf/evsel.c
> > > > > index 8441e3e1aaac..0ebd1d34436f 100644
> > > > > --- a/tools/lib/perf/evsel.c
> > > > +++ b/tools/lib/perf/evsel.c
> > > > > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> > > > >  #include <sys/ioctl.h>
> > > > >  #include <sys/mman.h>
> > > > >  #include <asm/bug.h>
> > > > > +#include <linux/math64.h>
> > > > >  
> > > > >  void perf_evsel__init(struct perf_evsel *evsel, struct perf_event_attr *attr,
> > > > >                      int idx)
> > > > > @@ -321,6 +322,11 @@ int perf_evsel__read(struct perf_evsel *evsel, int cpu, int thread,
> > > > >        if (readn(*fd, count->values, size) <= 0)
> > > > >                return -errno;
> > > > >  
> > > > > +     if (count->ena != count->run) {
> > > > > +             if (count->run != 0)
> > > > > +                     count->val = mul_u64_u64_div64(count->val, count->ena, count->run);
> > > > > +     }
> > > > 
> > > > so I think perf stat expect raw values in there and does the
> > > > scaling by itself, please check following code:
> > > > 
> > > > read_counters
> > > >   read_affinity_counters
> > > >     read_counter_cpu
> > > >       read_single_counter
> > > >         evsel__read_counter
> > > > 
> > > >   perf_stat_process_counter
> > > >     process_counter_maps
> > > >       process_counter_values
> > > >         perf_counts_values__scale
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > perhaps we could export perf_counts_values__scale if it'd be any help
> > > 
> > > Thank you for your comment.
> > > 
> > > The purpose of this patch is to unify the counters obtained with 
> > > perf_evsel__read() to scaled or unscaled values.
> > > 
> > > perf_evsel__read() gets counter by perf_mmap__read_self() if RDPMC is 
> > > available, else gets by readn(). In current implementation, caller 
> > > gets scaled counter if goes through RDPMC path, otherwise gets unscaled 
> > > counter via readn() path.
> > > 
> > > However caller cannnot know which path were taken.
> > > 
> > > If caller expects a raw value, I think the RDPMC path should also 
> > > return an unscaled counter.
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/mmap.c b/tools/lib/perf/mmap.c
> > > index c89dfa5..aaa4579 100644
> > > --- a/tools/lib/perf/mmap.c
> > > +++ b/tools/lib/perf/mmap.c
> > > @@ -353,8 +353,6 @@ int perf_mmap__read_self(struct perf_mmap *map, struct perf_counts_values *count
> > >                 count->ena += delta;
> > >                 if (idx)
> > >                         count->run += delta;
> > > -
> > > -               cnt = mul_u64_u64_div64(cnt, count->ena, count->run);
> > 
> > perf stat does not mmap counters so this should not be invoked
> > within perf stat.. but we should be consistent and scale after
> > calling perf_evsel__read.. and give user the possibility to get
> > un-scaled counts
> > 
> > that perhaps brings new feature.. mmap perf stat counters to invoke
> > the fast reading path for counters.. IIRC it should be matter just
> > to mmap the first 'user' page
> 
> Thank you for your comment.
> I think it will be good that perf stat supports rdpmc.
> 
> I will modify the patch. 

I think rdpmc cannot measure the command/program specified in perf stat 
because it measures the calling thread of perf_event_open.
If my understanding is wrong, please point it out to me.

Best Regards
Shunsuke