Re: [PATCH 12/13] riscv: icicle-kit: update microchip icicle kit device tree

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 08/11/2021 16:05, conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Update the device tree for the icicle kit by splitting it into a third part,
> which contains peripherals in the fpga fabric, add new peripherals
> (spi, qspi, gpio, rtc, pcie, system services, i2c), update parts of the memory
> map which have been changed.

This should be multiple commits because you mix up refactoring (split)
and adding new features. The patch is really, really difficult to
review. I gave up in the middle.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs-fabric.dtsi  |  21 ++
>  .../microchip/microchip-mpfs-icicle-kit.dts   | 159 +++++++--
>  .../boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs.dtsi    | 333 ++++++++++++++----
>  3 files changed, 428 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs-fabric.dtsi
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs-fabric.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs-fabric.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..8fa3356494f1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs-fabric.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT)
> +/* Copyright (c) 2020-2021 Microchip Technology Inc */
> +
> +/ {
> +	fpgadma: fpgadma@60020000 {
> +		compatible = "microchip,mpfs-fpga-dma-uio";
> +		#address-cells = <1>;
> +		#size-cells = <0>;
> +		reg = <0x0 0x60020000 0x0 0x1000>;
> +		interrupt-parent = <&plic>;
> +		interrupts = <PLIC_INT_FABRIC_F2H_2>;
> +		status = "okay";
> +	};
> +
> +	fpgalsram: fpga_lsram@61000000 {

Node names go with hyphen, but actually you should not need it, because
the name should be generic, e.g. "uio".

However there is no such compatible and checkpatch should complain about it.

> +		compatible = "generic-uio";
> +		reg = <0x0 0x61000000 0x0 0x0001000
> +			0x14 0x00000000 0x0 0x00010000>;
> +		status = "okay";
> +	};
> +};
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs-icicle-kit.dts b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs-icicle-kit.dts
> index fc1e5869df1b..4212129fcdf1 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs-icicle-kit.dts
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs-icicle-kit.dts
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT)
> -/* Copyright (c) 2020 Microchip Technology Inc */
> +/* Copyright (c) 2020-2021 Microchip Technology Inc */
>  
>  /dts-v1/;
>  
> @@ -13,72 +13,187 @@ / {
>  	compatible = "microchip,mpfs-icicle-kit", "microchip,mpfs";
>  
>  	aliases {
> -		ethernet0 = &emac1;
> -		serial0 = &serial0;
> -		serial1 = &serial1;
> -		serial2 = &serial2;
> -		serial3 = &serial3;> +		mmuart0 = &mmuart0;
> +		mmuart1 = &mmuart1;
> +		mmuart2 = &mmuart2;
> +		mmuart3 = &mmuart3;
> +		mmuart4 = &mmuart4;

Why? Commit msg does not explain it.

>  	};
>  
>  	chosen {
> -		stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
> +		stdout-path = "mmuart1:115200n8";
>  	};
>  
>  	cpus {
>  		timebase-frequency = <RTCCLK_FREQ>;
>  	};
>  
> -	memory@80000000 {
> +	ddrc_cache_lo: memory@80000000 {
>  		device_type = "memory";
> -		reg = <0x0 0x80000000 0x0 0x40000000>;
> -		clocks = <&clkcfg 26>;
> +		reg = <0x0 0x80000000 0x0 0x2e000000>;
> +		clocks = <&clkcfg CLK_DDRC>;
> +		status = "okay";
> +	};
> +
> +	ddrc_cache_hi: memory@1000000000 {
> +		device_type = "memory";
> +		reg = <0x10 0x0 0x0 0x40000000>;
> +		clocks = <&clkcfg CLK_DDRC>;
> +		status = "okay";
>  	};
>  };
>  
> -&serial0 {
> +&mmuart1 {
>  	status = "okay";
>  };
>  
> -&serial1 {
> +&mmuart2 {
>  	status = "okay";
>  };
>  
> -&serial2 {
> +&mmuart3 {
>  	status = "okay";
>  };
>  
> -&serial3 {
> +&mmuart4 {
>  	status = "okay";
>  };
>  
>  &mmc {
>  	status = "okay";
> -
>  	bus-width = <4>;
>  	disable-wp;
>  	cap-sd-highspeed;
> +	cap-mmc-highspeed;
>  	card-detect-delay = <200>;
> +	mmc-ddr-1_8v;
> +	mmc-hs200-1_8v;
>  	sd-uhs-sdr12;
>  	sd-uhs-sdr25;
>  	sd-uhs-sdr50;
>  	sd-uhs-sdr104;
>  };
>  
> -&emac0 {
> +&spi0 {
> +	status = "okay";
> +	spidev@0 {
> +		compatible = "spidev";

1. There is no such compatible,
2. You should have big fat warning when booting, so such DT cannot be
accepted.

> +		reg = <0>; /* CS 0 */
> +		spi-max-frequency = <10000000>;
> +		status = "okay";
> +	};
> +};
> +
> +&spi1 {
> +	status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&qspi {
> +	status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&i2c0 {
> +	status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&i2c1 {
> +	status = "okay";
> +	pac193x: pac193x@10 {

Generic node name. Looks like compatible is not documented, so first
bindings.


> +		compatible = "microchip,pac1934";
> +		reg = <0x10>;
> +		samp-rate = <64>;
> +		status = "okay";
> +		ch0: channel0 {
> +			uohms-shunt-res = <10000>;
> +			rail-name = "VDDREG";
> +			channel_enabled;
> +		};
> +		ch1: channel1 {
> +			uohms-shunt-res = <10000>;
> +			rail-name = "VDDA25";
> +			channel_enabled;
> +		};
> +		ch2: channel2 {
> +			uohms-shunt-res = <10000>;
> +			rail-name = "VDD25";
> +			channel_enabled;
> +		};
> +		ch3: channel3 {
> +			uohms-shunt-res = <10000>;
> +			rail-name = "VDDA_REG";
> +			channel_enabled;
> +		};
> +	};
> +};
> +
> +&mac0 {
> +	status = "okay";
>  	phy-mode = "sgmii";
>  	phy-handle = <&phy0>;
> -	phy0: ethernet-phy@8 {
> -		reg = <8>;
> -		ti,fifo-depth = <0x01>;
> -	};
>  };
>  
> -&emac1 {
> +&mac1 {

I gave up here, it's not easy to find what is effect of refactoring,
what is a new node.

Best regards,
Krzysztof