Re: [PATCH 09/13] dt-bindings: gpio: add bindings for microchip mpfs gpio

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Conor,

On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 4:07 PM <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add device tree bindings for the gpio controller on
> the Microchip PolarFire SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for your patch!

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/gpio/microchip,mpfs-gpio.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Microchip MPFS GPIO Controller Device Tree Bindings
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +description: |
> +  This GPIO controller is found on the Microchip PolarFire SoC.
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    items:
> +      - enum:
> +          - microchip,mpfs-gpio
> +          - microsemi,ms-pf-mss-gpio

What's the difference between these two?
If there is a difference, please add a comment "# <explanation>"
to each entry.
If there is no difference, please drop the second one.

> +
> +  reg:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  interrupts:
> +    description:
> +      Interrupt mapping, one per GPIO. Maximum 32 GPIOs.
> +    minItems: 1
> +    maxItems: 32
> +
> +  interrupt-controller: true
> +
> +  clocks:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  "#gpio-cells":
> +    const: 2
> +
> +  ngpios:
> +    description:
> +      The number of GPIOs available.
> +    minimum: 1
> +    maximum: 32
> +    default: 32
> +
> +  gpio-controller: true
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +  - interrupts
> +  - "#interrupt-cells"
> +  - "#gpio-cells"
> +  - gpio-controller
> +  - clocks

Any specific reason interrupt-controller is not required?

> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    #include "dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h"
> +    #include "dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/microchip,mpfs-plic.h"
> +    soc {
> +      #address-cells = <2>;
> +      #size-cells = <2>;

Just drop these two...

> +      gpio2: gpio@20122000 {
> +        compatible = "microchip,mpfs-gpio";
> +        reg = <0x0 0x20122000 0x0 0x1000>;

... and the zeros here.

> +        clocks = <&clkcfg CLK_GPIO2>;
> +        interrupt-parent = <&plic>;
> +        interrupts = <PLIC_INT_GPIO2_NON_DIRECT
> +          PLIC_INT_GPIO2_NON_DIRECT
> +          PLIC_INT_GPIO2_NON_DIRECT
> +          PLIC_INT_GPIO2_NON_DIRECT
> +          PLIC_INT_GPIO2_NON_DIRECT
> +          PLIC_INT_GPIO2_NON_DIRECT
> +          PLIC_INT_GPIO2_NON_DIRECT
> +          PLIC_INT_GPIO2_NON_DIRECT
> +          PLIC_INT_GPIO2_NON_DIRECT
> +          PLIC_INT_GPIO2_NON_DIRECT
> +          PLIC_INT_GPIO2_NON_DIRECT
> +          PLIC_INT_GPIO2_NON_DIRECT
> +          PLIC_INT_GPIO2_NON_DIRECT
> +          PLIC_INT_GPIO2_NON_DIRECT
> +          PLIC_INT_GPIO2_NON_DIRECT
> +          PLIC_INT_GPIO2_NON_DIRECT
> +          PLIC_INT_GPIO2_NON_DIRECT
> +          PLIC_INT_GPIO2_NON_DIRECT
> +          PLIC_INT_GPIO2_NON_DIRECT
> +          PLIC_INT_GPIO2_NON_DIRECT
> +          PLIC_INT_GPIO2_NON_DIRECT
> +          PLIC_INT_GPIO2_NON_DIRECT
> +          PLIC_INT_GPIO2_NON_DIRECT
> +          PLIC_INT_GPIO2_NON_DIRECT
> +          PLIC_INT_GPIO2_NON_DIRECT
> +          PLIC_INT_GPIO2_NON_DIRECT
> +          PLIC_INT_GPIO2_NON_DIRECT
> +          PLIC_INT_GPIO2_NON_DIRECT
> +          PLIC_INT_GPIO2_NON_DIRECT
> +          PLIC_INT_GPIO2_NON_DIRECT
> +          PLIC_INT_GPIO2_NON_DIRECT
> +          PLIC_INT_GPIO2_NON_DIRECT>;
> +        gpio-controller;
> +        #gpio-cells = <2>;
> +        status = "disabled";

Please drop this.

> +      };
> +    };

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds