Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] kscan: Use preemption model accessors
From: Valentin Schneider
Date: Thu Nov 11 2021 - 05:57:10 EST
On 11/11/21 10:11, Marco Elver wrote:
> Subject s/kscan/kcsan/
>
Woops...
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 08:24PM +0000, Valentin Schneider wrote:
>> Per PREEMPT_DYNAMIC, checking CONFIG_PREEMPT doesn't tell you the actual
>> preemption model of the live kernel. Use the newly-introduced accessors
>> instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@xxxxxxx>
>
> Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Though it currently doesn't compile as a module due to missing
> EXPORT_SYMBOL of is_preempt*().
>
>> ---
>> kernel/kcsan/kcsan_test.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/kcsan/kcsan_test.c b/kernel/kcsan/kcsan_test.c
>> index dc55fd5a36fc..14d811eb9a21 100644
>> --- a/kernel/kcsan/kcsan_test.c
>> +++ b/kernel/kcsan/kcsan_test.c
>> @@ -1005,13 +1005,13 @@ static const void *nthreads_gen_params(const void *prev, char *desc)
>> else
>> nthreads *= 2;
>>
>> - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT) || !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KCSAN_INTERRUPT_WATCHER)) {
>> + if (!is_preempt_full() || !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KCSAN_INTERRUPT_WATCHER)) {
>> /*
>> * Without any preemption, keep 2 CPUs free for other tasks, one
>> * of which is the main test case function checking for
>> * completion or failure.
>> */
>> - const long min_unused_cpus = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE) ? 2 : 0;
>> + const long min_unused_cpus = is_preempt_none() ? 2 : 0;
>> const long min_required_cpus = 2 + min_unused_cpus;
>>
>> if (num_online_cpus() < min_required_cpus) {
>> --
>> 2.25.1