[PATCH 1/6] x86/cpu: Allow feature bit names from /proc/cpuinfo in clearcpuid=

From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Fri Nov 12 2021 - 05:33:02 EST


From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>

Having to give the X86_FEATURE array indices in order to disable a
feature bit for testing is not really user-friendly. So accept the
feature bit names too.

Some feature bits don't have names so there the array indices are still
accepted, of course.

Clearing CPUID flags is not something which should be done in production
so taint the kernel too.

An exemplary cmdline would then be something like:

clearcpuid=de,440,smca,succory,bmi1,3dnow ("succory" is wrong on
purpose).

and it says:

[ 0.000000] Clearing CPUID bits: de 13:24 smca bmi1 3dnow

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
---
.../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 11 ++--
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 51 ++++++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
index 0905d2cdb2d5..dadb09d30212 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -622,12 +622,17 @@
Defaults to zero when built as a module and to
10 seconds when built into the kernel.

- clearcpuid=BITNUM[,BITNUM...] [X86]
+ clearcpuid=X[,X...] [X86]
Disable CPUID feature X for the kernel. See
arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h for the valid bit
- numbers. Note the Linux specific bits are not necessarily
- stable over kernel options, but the vendor specific
+ numbers X. Note the Linux-specific bits are not necessarily
+ stable over kernel options, but the vendor-specific
ones should be.
+ X can also be a string as appearing in the flags: line
+ in /proc/cpuinfo which does not have the above
+ instability issue. However, not all features have names
+ in /proc/cpuinfo.
+ Note that using this option will taint your kernel.
Also note that user programs calling CPUID directly
or using the feature without checking anything
will still see it. This just prevents it from
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index 0083464de5e3..0d1cf5c65b0c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -1237,8 +1237,8 @@ static void detect_nopl(void)
static void __init cpu_parse_early_param(void)
{
char arg[128];
- char *argptr = arg;
- int arglen, res, bit;
+ char *argptr = arg, *opt;
+ int arglen, taint = 0;

#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
if (cmdline_find_option_bool(boot_command_line, "no387"))
@@ -1266,21 +1266,48 @@ static void __init cpu_parse_early_param(void)
return;

pr_info("Clearing CPUID bits:");
- do {
- res = get_option(&argptr, &bit);
- if (res == 0 || res == 3)
- break;

- /* If the argument was too long, the last bit may be cut off */
- if (res == 1 && arglen >= sizeof(arg))
- break;
+ while (argptr) {
+ unsigned int bit;

- if (bit >= 0 && bit < NCAPINTS * 32) {
- pr_cont(" " X86_CAP_FMT, x86_cap_flag(bit));
+ opt = strsep(&argptr, ",");
+
+ /*
+ * Handle naked numbers first for feature flags which don't
+ * have names.
+ */
+ if (!kstrtouint(opt, 10, &bit)) {
+ if (bit < NCAPINTS * 32) {
+ pr_cont(" " X86_CAP_FMT, x86_cap_flag(bit));
+ setup_clear_cpu_cap(bit);
+ taint++;
+ }
+ /*
+ * The assumption is that there are no feature names with only
+ * numbers in the name thus go to the next argument.
+ */
+ continue;
+ }
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_FEATURE_NAMES
+ for (bit = 0; bit < 32 * NCAPINTS; bit++) {
+ if (!x86_cap_flag(bit))
+ continue;
+
+ if (strcmp(x86_cap_flag(bit), opt))
+ continue;
+
+ pr_cont(" %s", opt);
setup_clear_cpu_cap(bit);
+ taint++;
+ break;
}
- } while (res == 2);
+#endif
+ }
pr_cont("\n");
+
+ if (taint)
+ add_taint(TAINT_CPU_OUT_OF_SPEC, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
}

/*
--
2.29.2