Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Introduce the pkill_on_warn parameter

From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Fri Nov 12 2021 - 16:33:06 EST

Next message: kernel test robot: "[avpatel:riscv_kvm_aia_v1 17/47] arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c:3: warning: This comment starts with '/**', but isn't a kernel-doc comment. Refer Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst"
Previous message: Andy Shevchenko: "Re: [PATCH 0/4] spi: dw: Cleanup macros/funcs naming and add IP-core version support"
In reply to: Alexander Popov: "Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Introduce the pkill_on_warn parameter"
Next in thread: Alexander Popov: "Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Introduce the pkill_on_warn parameter"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 10:52 AM Alexander Popov <alex.popov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone!
> Friendly ping for your feedback.

I still haven't heard a compelling _reason_ for this all, and why
anybody should ever use this or care?

Linus

Next message: kernel test robot: "[avpatel:riscv_kvm_aia_v1 17/47] arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c:3: warning: This comment starts with '/**', but isn't a kernel-doc comment. Refer Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst"
Previous message: Andy Shevchenko: "Re: [PATCH 0/4] spi: dw: Cleanup macros/funcs naming and add IP-core version support"
In reply to: Alexander Popov: "Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Introduce the pkill_on_warn parameter"
Next in thread: Alexander Popov: "Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Introduce the pkill_on_warn parameter"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]