Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Update number of zapped pages even if page list is stable

[David Matlack]

On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 2:14 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> When zapping obsolete pages, update the running count of zapped pages
> regardless of whether or not the list has become unstable due to zapping
> a shadow page with its own child shadow pages.  If the VM is backed by
> mostly 4kb pages, KVM can zap an absurd number of SPTEs without bumping
> the batch count and thus without yielding.  In the worst case scenario,
> this can cause an RCU stall.
>
>   rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU
>   rcu:     52-....: (20999 ticks this GP) idle=7be/1/0x4000000000000000
>                                           softirq=15759/15759 fqs=5058
>    (t=21016 jiffies g=66453 q=238577)
>   NMI backtrace for cpu 52
>   Call Trace:
>    ...
>    mark_page_accessed+0x266/0x2f0
>    kvm_set_pfn_accessed+0x31/0x40
>    handle_removed_tdp_mmu_page+0x259/0x2e0
>    __handle_changed_spte+0x223/0x2c0
>    handle_removed_tdp_mmu_page+0x1c1/0x2e0
>    __handle_changed_spte+0x223/0x2c0
>    handle_removed_tdp_mmu_page+0x1c1/0x2e0
>    __handle_changed_spte+0x223/0x2c0
>    zap_gfn_range+0x141/0x3b0
>    kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_invalidated_roots+0xc8/0x130

This is a useful patch but I don't see the connection with this stall.
The stall is detected in kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_invalidated_roots, which runs
after kvm_zap_obsolete_pages. How would rescheduling during
kvm_zap_obsolete_pages help?

>    kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast+0x121/0x190
>    kvm_mmu_invalidate_zap_pages_in_memslot+0xe/0x10
>    kvm_page_track_flush_slot+0x5c/0x80
>    kvm_arch_flush_shadow_memslot+0xe/0x10
>    kvm_set_memslot+0x172/0x4e0
>    __kvm_set_memory_region+0x337/0x590
>    kvm_vm_ioctl+0x49c/0xf80
>
> Fixes: fbb158cb88b6 ("KVM: x86/mmu: Revert "Revert "KVM: MMU: zap pages in batch""")
> Reported-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ben Gardon <bgardon@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> I haven't actually verified this makes David's RCU stall go away, but I did
> verify that "batch" stays at "0" before and increments as expected after,
> and that KVM does yield as expected after.
>
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index 33794379949e..89480fab09c6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -5575,6 +5575,7 @@ static void kvm_zap_obsolete_pages(struct kvm *kvm)
>  {
>         struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, *node;
>         int nr_zapped, batch = 0;
> +       bool unstable;

nit: Declare unstable in the body of the loop. (So should nr_zapped
and batch but that's unrelated to your change.)

>
>  restart:
>         list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(sp, node,
> @@ -5606,11 +5607,12 @@ static void kvm_zap_obsolete_pages(struct kvm *kvm)
>                         goto restart;
>                 }
>
> -               if (__kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page(kvm, sp,
> -                               &kvm->arch.zapped_obsolete_pages, &nr_zapped)) {
> -                       batch += nr_zapped;
> +               unstable = __kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page(kvm, sp,
> +                               &kvm->arch.zapped_obsolete_pages, &nr_zapped);
> +               batch += nr_zapped;
> +
> +               if (unstable)
>                         goto restart;
> -               }
>         }
>
>         /*
> --
> 2.34.0.rc1.387.gb447b232ab-goog
>