Re: [PATCH 0/2] avoid spurious blocked load update
From: Tim Chen
Date: Tue Nov 16 2021 - 18:48:42 EST
On Fri, 2021-11-12 at 10:58 +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> This patchset is a follow up of :
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211019123537.17146-1-vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
> It ensures that newly idle load balance will not kick the update of
> blocked load if it skips the load balance because avg_idle is too
> short.
> It also makes sure that rq->next_balance doesn't go in the past when
> updated.
>
> Tim Chen (1):
> sched: sched: Fix rq->next_balance time updated to earlier than
> current time
>
> Vincent Guittot (1):
> sched/fair: skip newidle update stats
>
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
Vincent,
Got some data back from the benchmark team.
To my surprise, the skip_new_idle_update_stats patch
actually makes things a little worse.
Relative Performance
(higher better)
5.15 rc4 vanilla (cgroup disabled) 100%
5.15 rc4 vanilla (cgroup enabled) 96%
patch v2 96%
patch v3 96%
patch v3
+skip_new_idle_update_stats 93.7%
patch v3
+skip_new_idle_update_stats
+Fix rq->next_balance_time 93.7%
The cpu utilization actually is the similar compared with
having just the v3 patch. In both cases they are
81% user
12% kernel
2% idle
5% waiting for IO
Profile on key functions
in load balancing shows a little more cpu utilization,
which is unexpected as we are cutting short
the newidle_balance.
patch v3
0.56% [k] __update_load_avg_cfs_rq
0.51% [k] update_load_avg
0.39% [k] update_blocked_averages
0.36% [k] __update_load_avg_se
0.05% [k] newidle_balance
patch v3 + skip_new_idle_update_stats
0.58% [k] __update_load_avg_cfs_rq
0.53% [k] update_load_avg
0.40% [k] update_blocked_averages
0.37% [k] __update_load_avg_se
0.06% [k] newidle_balance
Context switch frequency is lower by 4% with the skip_new_idle_update_stats
patch.
Thanks.
Tim