Re: Build regressions/improvements in v5.16-rc1
From: Nick Terrell
Date: Tue Nov 16 2021 - 21:19:43 EST
> On Nov 16, 2021, at 6:05 PM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 11/16/21 5:59 PM, Nick Terrell wrote:
>>> On Nov 15, 2021, at 8:44 AM, Helge Deller <deller@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/15/21 17:12, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 4:54 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> Below is the list of build error/warning regressions/improvements in
>>>>> v5.16-rc1[1] compared to v5.15[2].
>>>>>
>>>>> Summarized:
>>>>> - build errors: +20/-13
>>>>> - build warnings: +3/-28
>>>>>
>>>>> Happy fixing! ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks to the linux-next team for providing the build service.
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/linus/head/fa55b7dcdc43c1aa1ba12bca9d2dd4318c2a0dbf/ (all 90 configs)
>>>>> [2] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/linus/head/8bb7eca972ad531c9b149c0a51ab43a417385813/ (all 90 configs)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *** ERRORS ***
>>>>>
>>>>> 20 error regressions:
>>>>> + /kisskb/src/arch/parisc/include/asm/jump_label.h: error: expected ':' before '__stringify': => 33:4, 18:4
>>>>> + /kisskb/src/arch/parisc/include/asm/jump_label.h: error: label 'l_yes' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-label]: => 38:1, 23:1
>>>>
>>>> due to static_branch_likely() in crypto/api.c
>>>>
>>>> parisc-allmodconfig
>>>
>>> fixed now in the parisc for-next git tree.
>>>
>>>
>>>>> + /kisskb/src/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h: error: "COND" redefined [-Werror]: => 531
>>>>> + /kisskb/src/lib/zstd/compress/zstd_double_fast.c: error: the frame size of 3252 bytes is larger than 1536 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]: => 47:1
>>>>> + /kisskb/src/lib/zstd/compress/zstd_double_fast.c: error: the frame size of 3360 bytes is larger than 1536 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]: => 499:1
>>>>> + /kisskb/src/lib/zstd/compress/zstd_double_fast.c: error: the frame size of 5344 bytes is larger than 1536 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]: => 334:1
>>>>> + /kisskb/src/lib/zstd/compress/zstd_double_fast.c: error: the frame size of 5380 bytes is larger than 1536 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]: => 354:1
>>>>> + /kisskb/src/lib/zstd/compress/zstd_fast.c: error: the frame size of 1824 bytes is larger than 1536 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]: => 372:1
>>>>> + /kisskb/src/lib/zstd/compress/zstd_fast.c: error: the frame size of 2224 bytes is larger than 1536 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]: => 204:1
>>>>> + /kisskb/src/lib/zstd/compress/zstd_fast.c: error: the frame size of 3800 bytes is larger than 1536 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]: => 476:1
>>>>
>>>> parisc-allmodconfig
>>>
>>> parisc needs much bigger frame sizes, so I'm not astonished here.
>>> During the v5.15 cycl I increased it to 1536 (from 1280), so I'm simply tempted to
>>> increase it this time to 4096, unless someone has a better idea....
>> This patch set should fix the zstd stack size warnings [0]. I’ve
>> verified the fix using the same tooling: gcc-8-hppa-linux-gnu.
>> I’ll send the PR to Linus tomorrow. I’ve been informed that it
>> isn't strictly necessary to send the patches to the mailing list
>> for bug fixes, but its already done, so I’ll wait and see if there
>> is any feedback.
>
> IMO several (or many more) people would disagree with that.
>
> "strictly?" OK, it's probably possible that almost any patch
> could be merged without being on a mailing list, but it's not
> desirable (except in the case of "security" patches).
Good to know! Thanks for the advice, I wasn’t really sure what
the best practice is for sending patches to your own tree, as I
didn't see anything about it in the maintainer guide.
Thanks,
Nick Terrell
> --
> ~Randy