Re: [PATCH] tracing/histogram: Fix UAF in destroy_hist_field()

From: Kalesh Singh
Date: Tue Nov 16 2021 - 23:37:26 EST


On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 7:47 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 18:12:22 -0800
> Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Calling destroy_hist_field() on an expression will recursively free
> > any operands associated with the expression. If during expression
> > parsing the operands of the expression are already set when an error
> > is encountered, there is no need to explicity free the operands. Doing
> > so will result in destroy_hist_field() being called twice for the
> > operands and lead to a use-after-free (UAF) error.
> >
> > Fix this by only calling destroy_hist_field() for the expression if the
> > operands are already set.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Fixes: 8b5d46fd7a38 ("tracing/histogram: Optimize division by constants")
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
> > index 5ea2c9ec54a6..e3856eaf2ac3 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
> > @@ -2669,7 +2669,7 @@ static struct hist_field *parse_expr(struct hist_trigger_data *hist_data,
> > if (!divisor) {
> > hist_err(file->tr, HIST_ERR_DIVISION_BY_ZERO, errpos(str));
> > ret = -EDOM;
> > - goto free;
> > + goto free_expr;
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -2709,7 +2709,7 @@ static struct hist_field *parse_expr(struct hist_trigger_data *hist_data,
> > expr->type = kstrdup_const(operand1->type, GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!expr->type) {
> > ret = -ENOMEM;
> > - goto free;
> > + goto free_expr;
> > }
> >
> > expr->name = expr_str(expr, 0);
> > @@ -2719,6 +2719,7 @@ static struct hist_field *parse_expr(struct hist_trigger_data *hist_data,
> > free:
> > destroy_hist_field(operand1, 0);
> > destroy_hist_field(operand2, 0);
> > +free_expr:
> > destroy_hist_field(expr, 0);
> >
> > return ERR_PTR(ret);
> >
> > base-commit: 8ab774587903771821b59471cc723bba6d893942
>
> Wouldn't this be a simpler and more robust fix?
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
> index 5ea2c9ec54a6..aab69b4ffe11 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
> @@ -2717,8 +2717,10 @@ static struct hist_field *parse_expr(struct hist_trigger_data *hist_data,
>
> return expr;
> free:
> - destroy_hist_field(operand1, 0);
> - destroy_hist_field(operand2, 0);
> + if (!expr || expr->operand[0] != operand1)
> + destroy_hist_field(operand1, 0);
> + if (!expr || expr->operand[1] != operand2)
> + destroy_hist_field(operand2, 0);
> destroy_hist_field(expr, 0);

Hi Steve,

Agreed. What you suggested is simpler to work with. I'll respin a new version.

Thanks,
Kalesh

>
> return ERR_PTR(ret);
>
>
> I'm worried about the complexity of having to know where to free what,
> and not just figuring it out at the end.
>
> -- Steve