Re: [PATCH v7 08/11] tools/perf/test: make perf test adopt to task comm size change

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Date: Wed Nov 17 2021 - 09:31:09 EST

Em Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 06:04:16AM +0000, Yafang Shao escreveu:
> kernel test robot reported a perf-test failure after I extended task comm
> size from 16 to 24. The failure as follows,
>
> 2021-10-13 18:00:46 sudo /usr/src/perf_selftests-x86_64-rhel-8.3-317419b91ef4eff4e2f046088201e4dc4065caa0/tools/perf/perf test 15
> 15: Parse sched tracepoints fields : FAILED!
>
> The reason is perf-test requires a fixed-size task comm. If we extend
> task comm size to 24, it will not equil with the required size 16 in perf
> test.
>
> After some analyzation, I found perf itself can adopt to the size
> change, for example, below is the output of perf-sched after I extend
> comm size to 24 -
>
> task 614 ( kthreadd: 84), nr_events: 1
> task 615 ( systemd: 843), nr_events: 1
> task 616 ( networkd-dispat: 1026), nr_events: 1
> task 617 ( systemd: 846), nr_events: 1
>
> $ cat /proc/843/comm
> networkd-dispatcher
>
> The task comm can be displayed correctly as expected.
>
> Replace old hard-coded 16 with the new one can fix the warning, but we'd
> better make the test accept both old and new sizes, then it can be
> backward compatibility.
>
> After this patch, the perf-test succeeds no matter task comm is 16 or
> 24 -
>
> 15: Parse sched tracepoints fields : Ok
>
> This patch is a preparation for the followup patch.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@xxxxxxxxx>
> Suggested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tools/include/linux/sched.h | 11 +++++++++++
> tools/perf/tests/evsel-tp-sched.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
> 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/include/linux/sched.h
>
> diff --git a/tools/include/linux/sched.h b/tools/include/linux/sched.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..0d575afd7f43
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#ifndef _TOOLS_LINUX_SCHED_H
> +#define _TOOLS_LINUX_SCHED_H
> +
> +/* Keep both length for backward compatibility */
> +enum {
> + TASK_COMM_LEN_16 = 16,
> + TASK_COMM_LEN = 24,
> +};
> +

I don't think this is a good idea, to have it in tools/include/linux/,
we have /usr/include/linux/sched.h, this may end up confusing the build
at some point as your proposal is for a trimmed down header while what
is in /usr/include/linux/sched.h doesn't have just this.

But since we're using enums for this, we can't check for it with:

#ifdef TASK_COMM_LEN_16
#define TASK_COMM_LEN_16 16
#endif

ditto for TASK_COMM_LEN and be future proof, so I'd say just use
hardcoded values in tools/perf/tests/evsel-tp-sched.c?

- Arnaldo

> +#endif /* _TOOLS_LINUX_SCHED_H */
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/evsel-tp-sched.c b/tools/perf/tests/evsel-tp-sched.c
> index f9e34bd26cf3..029f2a8c8e51 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/evsel-tp-sched.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/evsel-tp-sched.c
> @@ -1,11 +1,13 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> #include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <traceevent/event-parse.h>
> #include "evsel.h"
> #include "tests.h"
> #include "debug.h"
>
> -static int evsel__test_field(struct evsel *evsel, const char *name, int size, bool should_be_signed)
> +static int evsel__test_field_alt(struct evsel *evsel, const char *name,
> + int size, int alternate_size, bool should_be_signed)
> {
> struct tep_format_field *field = evsel__field(evsel, name);
> int is_signed;
> @@ -23,15 +25,24 @@ static int evsel__test_field(struct evsel *evsel, const char *name, int size, bo
> ret = -1;
> }
>
> - if (field->size != size) {
> - pr_debug("%s: \"%s\" size (%d) should be %d!\n",
> + if (field->size != size && field->size != alternate_size) {
> + pr_debug("%s: \"%s\" size (%d) should be %d",
> evsel->name, name, field->size, size);
> + if (alternate_size > 0)
> + pr_debug(" or %d", alternate_size);
> + pr_debug("!\n");
> ret = -1;
> }
>
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int evsel__test_field(struct evsel *evsel, const char *name,
> + int size, bool should_be_signed)
> +{
> + return evsel__test_field_alt(evsel, name, size, -1, should_be_signed);
> +}
> +
> int test__perf_evsel__tp_sched_test(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_unused)
> {
> struct evsel *evsel = evsel__newtp("sched", "sched_switch");
> @@ -42,7 +53,8 @@ int test__perf_evsel__tp_sched_test(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int subtes
> return -1;
> }
>
> - if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "prev_comm", 16, false))
> + if (evsel__test_field_alt(evsel, "prev_comm", TASK_COMM_LEN_16,
> + TASK_COMM_LEN, false))
> ret = -1;
>
> if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "prev_pid", 4, true))
> @@ -54,7 +66,8 @@ int test__perf_evsel__tp_sched_test(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int subtes
> if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "prev_state", sizeof(long), true))
> ret = -1;
>
> - if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "next_comm", 16, false))
> + if (evsel__test_field_alt(evsel, "next_comm", TASK_COMM_LEN_16,
> + TASK_COMM_LEN, false))
> ret = -1;
>
> if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "next_pid", 4, true))
> @@ -72,7 +85,8 @@ int test__perf_evsel__tp_sched_test(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int subtes
> return -1;
> }
>
> - if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "comm", 16, false))
> + if (evsel__test_field_alt(evsel, "comm", TASK_COMM_LEN_16,
> + TASK_COMM_LEN, false))
> ret = -1;
>
> if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "pid", 4, true))
> --
> 2.17.1

--

- Arnaldo