Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] s390/kexec: fix kmemleak

[Baoquan He]

On 11/18/21 at 05:46am, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Baoquan,
> 
> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
> 
> [auto build test ERROR on s390/features]
> [also build test ERROR on linux/master linus/master v5.16-rc1 next-20211117]
> [cannot apply to kvms390/next]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Baoquan-He/s390-kexec-check-the-return-value-of-ipl_report_finish/20211116-112827
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git features
> config: s390-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
> compiler: s390-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>         # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/d5463ab680d37f95b493b71c487a51c039dfe845
>         git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
>         git fetch --no-tags linux-review Baoquan-He/s390-kexec-check-the-return-value-of-ipl_report_finish/20211116-112827
>         git checkout d5463ab680d37f95b493b71c487a51c039dfe845
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross ARCH=s390 
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>    arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c: In function 'arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup':
> >> arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c:332:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'kvfree'; did you mean 'vfree'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>      332 |         kvfree(image->arch.ipl_buf);
>          |         ^~~~~~
>          |         vfree

OK, kvfree is not wrong, seems vfree is more appropriate since it's
clear the ipl_buf is allocated with zvalloc() in ipl_report_finish().

Hi Heiko,

Could you help modify the code in your tree or append below patch to
mute the lkp complaint? Sorry for the inconvenience.