Re: [syzbot] possible deadlock in smc_switch_to_fallback

From: Wen Gu
Date: Sun Nov 21 2021 - 22:41:56 EST




On 2021/11/20 11:48 am, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
Adding Alibaba folks to CC.

On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 18:47:22 -0800 syzbot wrote:
Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit: 9539ba4308ad Merge tag 'riscv-for-linus-5.16-rc2' of git:/..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=17f79d01b00000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=6d3b8fd1977c1e73
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e979d3597f48262cb4ee
compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+e979d3597f48262cb4ee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
5.16.0-rc1-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor.3/1337 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88809466ce58 (&ei->socket.wq.wait){..-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:349 [inline]
ffff88809466ce58 (&ei->socket.wq.wait){..-.}-{2:2}, at: smc_switch_to_fallback+0x3d5/0x8c0 net/smc/af_smc.c:588

but task is already holding lock:
ffff88809466c258 (&ei->socket.wq.wait){..-.}-{2:2}, at: smc_switch_to_fallback+0x3ca/0x8c0 net/smc/af_smc.c:587

other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0
----
lock(&ei->socket.wq.wait);
lock(&ei->socket.wq.wait);

*** DEADLOCK ***

May be due to missing lock nesting notation

2 locks held by syz-executor.3/1337:
#0:
ffff888082ba8120 (sk_lock-AF_SMC){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1645 [inline]
ffff888082ba8120 (sk_lock-AF_SMC){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: smc_setsockopt+0x2b7/0xa40 net/smc/af_smc.c:2449
#1: ffff88809466c258 (&ei->socket.wq.wait){..-.}-{2:2}, at: smc_switch_to_fallback+0x3ca/0x8c0 net/smc/af_smc.c:587

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 1337 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc1-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106
print_deadlock_bug kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2956 [inline]
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2999 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3788 [inline]
__lock_acquire.cold+0x149/0x3ab kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5027
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5637 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5602
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:349 [inline]
smc_switch_to_fallback+0x3d5/0x8c0 net/smc/af_smc.c:588
smc_setsockopt+0x8ee/0xa40 net/smc/af_smc.c:2459
__sys_setsockopt+0x2db/0x610 net/socket.c:2176
__do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2187 [inline]
__se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2184 [inline]
__x64_sys_setsockopt+0xba/0x150 net/socket.c:2184
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7fa2a8fceae9
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 bc ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fa2a6544188 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000036
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fa2a90e1f60 RCX: 00007fa2a8fceae9
RDX: 0000000000000021 RSI: 0000000000000006 RDI: 0000000000000005
RBP: 00007fa2a9028f6d R08: 0000000000000010 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000020000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007ffc2297067f R14: 00007fa2a6544300 R15: 0000000000022000
</TASK>


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

We take this issue seriously and have started an investigation.

Thanks,
Wen Gu