Re: [PATCH] soc: ti: pruss: fix referenced node in error message

From: Suman Anna
Date: Mon Nov 22 2021 - 10:31:49 EST


+ Nishanth

On 11/20/21 1:53 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 01.09.21 17:03, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 23.06.21 17:51, Suman Anna wrote:
>>> On 6/21/21 1:08 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> So far, "(null)" is reported for the node that is missing clocks.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@xxxxxx>
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/soc/ti/pruss.c | 2 +-
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/pruss.c b/drivers/soc/ti/pruss.c
>>>> index f22ac1edbdd0..afc8aae68035 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/soc/ti/pruss.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/ti/pruss.c
>>>> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static int pruss_clk_init(struct pruss *pruss, struct device_node *cfg_node)
>>>>
>>>> clks_np = of_get_child_by_name(cfg_node, "clocks");
>>>> if (!clks_np) {
>>>> - dev_err(dev, "%pOF is missing its 'clocks' node\n", clks_np);
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "%pOF is missing its 'clocks' node\n", cfg_node);
>>>> return -ENODEV;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> This was not merged yet. Is it queued somewhere?
>>
>> Jan
>>
>
> Second reminder - still not seeing this in upstream.

Nishanth,
Can you pick this up?

regards
Suman