Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 01/13] mm/shmem: Introduce F_SEAL_GUEST

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 11/19/21 16:39, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > If qmeu can put all the guest memory in a memfd and not map it, then
> > I'd also like to see that the IOMMU can use this interface too so we
> > can have VFIO working in this configuration.
>
> In QEMU we usually want to (and must) be able to access guest memory
> from user space, with the current design we wouldn't even be able to
> temporarily mmap it -- which makes sense for encrypted memory only. The
> corner case really is encrypted memory. So I don't think we'll see a
> broad use of this feature outside of encrypted VMs in QEMU. I might be
> wrong, most probably I am:)

It's not _that_ crazy an idea, but it's going to be some work to teach 
KVM that it has to kmap/kunmap around all memory accesses.

I think it's great that memfd hooks are usable by more than one 
subsystem, OTOH it's fair that whoever needs it does the work---and VFIO 
does not need it for confidential VMs, yet, so it should be fine for now 
to have a single user.

On the other hand, as I commented already, the lack of locking in the 
register/unregister functions has to be fixed even with a single user. 
Another thing we can do already is change the guest_ops/guest_mem_ops to 
something like memfd_falloc_notifier_ops/memfd_pfn_ops, and the 
register/unregister functions to memfd_register/unregister_falloc_notifier.

Chao, can you also put this under a new CONFIG such as "bool MEMFD_OPS", 
and select it from KVM?

Thanks,

Paolo