Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
From: Mark Brown
Date: Tue Nov 23 2021 - 09:18:07 EST
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 09:26:45AM +0000, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> As a second thought - do we need such a stub function at all? I guess
> anyone who is actually adding a call to the
> rohm_regulator_set_voltage_sel_restricted() helper should also have the
> implementation selected. Failing to do so is probably indication of an
> error. Compile testing could perhaps be an exception but this is
> currently not supported.
> Should I just drop the stub or make it inline? Am I overlooking something?
Dropping it does seem reasonable, I can't immediately think of a case
where the stub would get used. I've queued your existing patch to try
to make sure that a fix lands tomorrow so (assuming no test issues)
please send a removal patch on top of that.
Description: PGP signature