[PATCH 05/10] ACPI: EC: Rearrange the loop in acpi_ec_event_handler()

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>

It is not necessary to check ec->nr_pending_queries against 0 in the
while () loop in acpi_ec_event_handler(), because that loop terminates
when ec->nr_pending_queries is 0 and the code depending on that can be
run after the loop has ended.

Modify the code accordingly and while at it rewrite the comment
regarding that code to make it clearer.

No intentional functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/acpi/ec.c |   21 ++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/ec.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/ec.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/ec.c
@@ -1230,18 +1230,17 @@ static void acpi_ec_event_handler(struct
 
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
 		ec->nr_pending_queries--;
-		/*
-		 * Before exit, make sure that this work item can be
-		 * scheduled again. There might be QR_EC failures, leaving
-		 * EC_FLAGS_QUERY_PENDING uncleared and preventing this work
-		 * item from being scheduled again.
-		 */
-		if (!ec->nr_pending_queries) {
-			if (ec_event_clearing == ACPI_EC_EVT_TIMING_STATUS ||
-			    ec_event_clearing == ACPI_EC_EVT_TIMING_QUERY)
-				acpi_ec_complete_query(ec);
-		}
 	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Before exit, make sure that the it will be possible to queue up the
+	 * event handling work again regardless of whether or not the query
+	 * queued up above is processed successfully.
+	 */
+	if (ec_event_clearing == ACPI_EC_EVT_TIMING_STATUS ||
+	    ec_event_clearing == ACPI_EC_EVT_TIMING_QUERY)
+		acpi_ec_complete_query(ec);
+
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
 
 	ec_dbg_evt("Event stopped");