Re: randomize_kstack: To init or not to init?

From: Marco Elver
Date: Thu Dec 09 2021 - 15:33:16 EST


On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 at 21:19, Segher Boessenkool
<segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 10:58:01AM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
> > Clang supports CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO, which appears to be the
> > default since dcb7c0b9461c2, which is why this came on my radar. And
> > Clang also performs auto-init of allocas when auto-init is on
> > (https://reviews.llvm.org/D60548), with no way to skip. As far as I'm
> > aware, GCC 12's upcoming -ftrivial-auto-var-init= doesn't yet auto-init
> > allocas.
>
> The space allocated by alloca is not an automatic variable, so of course
> it is not affected by this compiler flag. And it should not, this flag
> is explicitly for *small fixed-size* stack variables (initialising
> others can be much too expensive).
>
> > C. Introduce a new __builtin_alloca_uninitialized().
>
> That is completely backwards. That is the normal behaviour of alloca
> already. Also you can get __builtin_alloca inserted by the compiler
> (for a variable length array for example), and you typically do not want
> those initialised either, for the same reasons.

You're right, if we're strict about it, initializing allocas is
technically out-of-scope of that feature.

So, option D: Add a param to control this, and probably it shouldn't
do it by default. Let's see how far that gets then.