On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 7:15 PM Srinivasa Rao MandadapuYes. Will do it separate patch later.
<quic_srivasam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 12/8/2021 11:58 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:...
I would, but this means it should be in a separate change.Actually it's already mainline code. Just these patches are+#define NO_SLEW -1Naming sucks for the header.
LPI_NO_SLEW ?
rearrangement of old code.
still do you suggest to change?
...
Actually this also needs as separate patch. these patches will do as separate series.
Any comments on this? It sounds like further improvements.+struct lpi_pingroup {Are you going to convert this to use struct group_desc?
+ const char *name;
+ const unsigned int *pins;
+ unsigned int npins;
+ unsigned int pin;
+ /* Bit offset in slew register for SoundWire pins only */
+ int slew_offset;
+ unsigned int *funcs;
+ unsigned int nfuncs;
+};