RE: [PATCH] rcu: record kasan stack before enter local_irq_save()/restore() critical area
From: Zhang, Qiang1
Date: Sat Dec 25 2021 - 05:50:19 EST
>> Hi Marco, Are the following modifications clear to you?
>>I understood now that the contention you're talking about is from depot_lock, which wasn't clear before (I thought you ?intended to reduce contention by shortening some other critical section).
Sorry, I didn't explain clearly before.
> Subject: [PATCH] rcu: Reduce the consumption time of
> local_irq_save()/restore() critical area
>>Subject: rcu, kasan: Record work creation stack trace with interrupts enabled
> In non-production KASAN kernel, a large number of call stacks are
> recorded, it takes some time to acquire the global
> spinlock(depot_lock) inside kasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc(),
> increased interrupts disable time,
> kasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc() doesn't care if interrupts are
> enabled or not when called, so move it outside the critical area.
>>I think this might be clearer:
>>"Recording the work creation stack trace for KASAN reports in
>>call_rcu() is expensive, due to unwinding the stack, but also due to acquiring depot_lock inside stackdepot (which may be contended).
>>Because calling kasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc() does not require interrupts to already be disabled, this may unnecessarily extend the time with interrupts disabled.
>>
>>, move calling kasan_record_aux_stack() before the section with interrupts disabled."
Thanks Marco, your description is clearer, I will resend it.
> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
>>Acked-by: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c index
> 9b58bae0527a..36bd3f9e57b3 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -3068,8 +3068,8 @@ void call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
> }
> head->func = func;
> head->next = NULL;
> - local_irq_save(flags);
> kasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc(head);
> + local_irq_save(flags);
> rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
>
> Thanks,
> Zqiang