Re: [PATCH v3 13/33] iommu/mediatek: Remove the power status checking in tlb flush all

From: Yong Wu
Date: Sat Jan 08 2022 - 21:47:36 EST


On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 16:55 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 23/09/21 13:58, Yong Wu ha scritto:
> > To simplify the code, Remove the power status checking in the
> > tlb_flush_all, remove this:
> > if (pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(data->dev) <= 0)
> > continue;
> >
> > After this patch, the mtk_iommu_tlb_flush_all will be called from
> > a) isr
> > b) pm runtime resume callback
> > c) tlb flush range fail case
> > d) iommu_create_device_direct_mappings
> > -> iommu_flush_iotlb_all
> > In first three cases, the power and clock always are enabled; d) is
> > direct
> > mapping, the tlb flush is unnecessay since we already have
> > tlb_flush_all
> > in the pm_runtime_resume callback. When the iommu's power status is
> > changed to active, the tlb always is clean.
> >
> > In addition, there still are 2 reasons that don't add PM status
> > checking
> > in the tlb flush all:
> > a) Write tlb flush all register also is ok even though the HW has
> > no
> > power and clocks. Write ignore.
>
> Do you mean that the register write seemingly succeeds but the
> hardware discards it?
> Please, reword the `a` sentence to be clearer.

Yes. This is the "Write ignore" I tried to explain.

By the way, the tlb operation patches were moved to this patchset[1]
from Dafna. Would you help take a look at that one? I will send the
next mt8195 version based on that patchset.

[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/20211208120744.2415-1-dafna.hirschfeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Thanks.

>
> > b) pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(m4udev) is 0 when the tlb_flush_all
> > is called frm pm_runtime_resume cb. From this point, we can not add
> > this code above in this tlb_flush_all.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 20 +++++++-------------
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > index e9e94944ed91..4a33b6c6b1db 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > @@ -204,10 +204,14 @@ static struct mtk_iommu_domain
> > *to_mtk_domain(struct iommu_domain *dom)
> > return container_of(dom, struct mtk_iommu_domain, domain);
> > }
> >
> > -static void mtk_iommu_tlb_do_flush_all(struct mtk_iommu_data
> > *data)
> > +static void mtk_iommu_tlb_flush_all(struct mtk_iommu_data *data)
> > {
> > unsigned long flags;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * No need get power status since the HW PM status nearly is
> > active
> > + * when entering here.
>
> Please reword this comment to explain the entire situation.
>
> > + */
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&data->tlb_lock, flags);
> > writel_relaxed(F_INVLD_EN1 | F_INVLD_EN0,
> > data->base + data->plat_data->inv_sel_reg);
> > @@ -216,16 +220,6 @@ static void mtk_iommu_tlb_do_flush_all(struct
> > mtk_iommu_data *data)
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&data->tlb_lock, flags);
> > }
> >
> > -static void mtk_iommu_tlb_flush_all(struct mtk_iommu_data *data)
> > -{
> > - if (pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(data->dev) <= 0)
> > - return;
> > -
> > - mtk_iommu_tlb_do_flush_all(data);
> > -
> > - pm_runtime_put(data->dev);
> > -}
> > -
> > static void mtk_iommu_tlb_flush_range_sync(unsigned long iova,
> > size_t size,
> > struct mtk_iommu_data *data)
> > {
> > @@ -263,7 +257,7 @@ static void
> > mtk_iommu_tlb_flush_range_sync(unsigned long iova, size_t size,
> > if (ret) {
> > dev_warn(data->dev,
> > "Partial TLB flush timed out, falling
> > back to full flush\n");
> > - mtk_iommu_tlb_do_flush_all(data);
> > + mtk_iommu_tlb_flush_all(data);
> > }
> >
> > if (has_pm)
> > @@ -993,7 +987,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused
> > mtk_iommu_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> > *
> > * Thus, Make sure the tlb always is clean after each PM
> > resume.
> > */
> > - mtk_iommu_tlb_do_flush_all(data);
> > + mtk_iommu_tlb_flush_all(data);
> >
> > /*
> > * Uppon first resume, only enable the clk and return, since
> > the values of the
> >
>
>