Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] 9p/trans_fd: split into dedicated module

From: Thomas Weißschuh
Date: Mon Jan 10 2022 - 01:42:08 EST


Hi Dominique,

On 2022-01-10 09:57+0900, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> it's been a while but I had a second look as I intend on submitting this
> next week, just a small fixup on the Kconfig entry
>
> Thomas Weißschuh wrote on Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 08:38:21PM +0100:
> > diff --git a/net/9p/Kconfig b/net/9p/Kconfig
> > index 64468c49791f..af601129f1bb 100644
> > --- a/net/9p/Kconfig
> > +++ b/net/9p/Kconfig
> > @@ -15,6 +15,13 @@ menuconfig NET_9P
> >
> > if NET_9P
> >
> > +config NET_9P_FD
> > + depends on VIRTIO
>
> I think that's just a copypaste leftover from NET_9P_VIRTIO ?
> Since it used to be code within NET_9P and it's within a if NET_9P it
> shouldn't depend on anything.
>
> Also for compatibility I'd suggest we keep it on by default at this
> point, e.g. add 'default NET_9P' to this block:

Yes, you are correct on both points.

> diff --git a/net/9p/Kconfig b/net/9p/Kconfig
> index af601129f1bb..deabbd376cb1 100644
> --- a/net/9p/Kconfig
> +++ b/net/9p/Kconfig
> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ menuconfig NET_9P
> if NET_9P
>
> config NET_9P_FD
> - depends on VIRTIO
> + default NET_9P
> tristate "9P FD Transport"
> help
> This builds support for transports over TCP, Unix sockets and
>
>
> I'll just fixup the commit with a word in the message unless you have a
> problem with it, please let me know! :)

Looks good, thanks!

Thomas