Re: [mkp-scsi:for-next 67/132] drivers/scsi/elx/libefc/efc_els.c:73 efc_els_io_alloc_size() warn: sleeping in atomic context

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Mon Jan 10 2022 - 02:11:11 EST

Next message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] ixgb: Remove useless DMA-32 fallback configuration"
Previous message: Masami Hiramatsu: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: Have syscall trace events use trace_event_buffer_lock_reserve()"
In reply to: Dan Carpenter: "[mkp-scsi:for-next 67/132] drivers/scsi/elx/libefc/efc_els.c:73 efc_els_io_alloc_size() warn: sleeping in atomic context"
Next in thread: James Smart: "Re: [mkp-scsi:for-next 67/132] drivers/scsi/elx/libefc/efc_els.c:73 efc_els_io_alloc_size() warn: sleeping in atomic context"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

So while this warning is correct, it is not new. GFP_DMA can sleep
just like GFP_KERNEL. Someone was already trying to give this a spin
on the linux-scsi list, but we really need maintainer helper here.

Next message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] ixgb: Remove useless DMA-32 fallback configuration"
Previous message: Masami Hiramatsu: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: Have syscall trace events use trace_event_buffer_lock_reserve()"
In reply to: Dan Carpenter: "[mkp-scsi:for-next 67/132] drivers/scsi/elx/libefc/efc_els.c:73 efc_els_io_alloc_size() warn: sleeping in atomic context"
Next in thread: James Smart: "Re: [mkp-scsi:for-next 67/132] drivers/scsi/elx/libefc/efc_els.c:73 efc_els_io_alloc_size() warn: sleeping in atomic context"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]