Re: [PATCH 08/17] ptrace/m68k: Stop open coding ptrace_report_syscall

[Al Viro]

On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 06:54:57PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

> In fact Michael did so in "[PATCH v7 1/2] m68k/kernel - wire up
> syscall_trace_enter/leave for m68k"[1], but that's still stuck...
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/1624924520-17567-2-git-send-email-schmitzmic@xxxxxxxxx/

Looks sane, but I'd split it in two - switch to calling syscall_trace_{enter,leave}
and then handling the return values...

The former would keep the current behaviour (modulo reporting enter vs. leave
via PTRACE_GETEVENTMSG), the latter would allow syscall number change by tracer
and/or handling of seccomp/audit/whatnot.

For exit+signal work the former would suffice, and IMO it would be a good idea
to put that one into a shared branch to be pulled both by seccomp and by signal
series.  Would reduce the conflicts...

Objections?