Re: [PATCH 1/6] kunit: add example test case showing off all the expect macros
From: Brendan Higgins
Date: Mon Jan 10 2022 - 17:14:14 EST
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 8:23 PM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Currently, these macros are only really documented near the bottom of
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/kunit/api/test.html#c.KUNIT_FAIL.
>
> E.g. it's likely someone might just not realize that
> KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ() exists and instead use KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(strcmp())
> or similar.
>
> This can also serve as a basic smoketest that the KUnit assert machinery
> still works for all the macros.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@xxxxxxxxxx>
I still don't like how much this bloats the example test; aside from
that, this looks good.
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx>