Re: [kvalo-ath:pending 52/56] drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.c:5651 ath11k_wmi_tlv_fw_stats_data_parse() error: uninitialized symbol 'len'.
From: Kalle Valo
Date: Tue Jan 11 2022 - 09:26:48 EST
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 03:35:26PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> > bc5c448b70ff14 Wen Gong 2021-12-08 5629 static int
>> > ath11k_wmi_tlv_fw_stats_data_parse(struct ath11k_base *ab,
>> > bc5c448b70ff14 Wen Gong 2021-12-08 5630 struct wmi_tlv_fw_stats_parse
>> > *parse,
>> > bc5c448b70ff14 Wen Gong 2021-12-08 5631 const void *ptr)
>> > bc5c448b70ff14 Wen Gong 2021-12-08 5632 {
>> > bc5c448b70ff14 Wen Gong 2021-12-08 5633 struct ath11k_fw_stats *stats
>> > = parse->stats;
>> > bc5c448b70ff14 Wen Gong 2021-12-08 5634 const struct wmi_stats_event
>> > *ev = parse->ev;
>> > bc5c448b70ff14 Wen Gong 2021-12-08 5635 int i;
>> > bc5c448b70ff14 Wen Gong 2021-12-08 5636 const void *data = ptr;
>> > bc5c448b70ff14 Wen Gong 2021-12-08 5637 u32 len;
> ^^^^^^^^
> "len" is a local variable, not a parameter.
Ah, I only looked at the current ath-next branch.
>> > bc5c448b70ff14 Wen Gong 2021-12-08 5638
>> > bc5c448b70ff14 Wen Gong 2021-12-08 5639 if (!ev) {
>> > bc5c448b70ff14 Wen Gong 2021-12-08 5640 ath11k_warn(ab, "failed to
>> > fetch update stats ev");
>> > bc5c448b70ff14 Wen Gong 2021-12-08 5641 return -EPROTO;
>> > bc5c448b70ff14 Wen Gong 2021-12-08 5642 }
>> > d5c65159f28953 Kalle Valo 2019-11-23 5643
>> > d5c65159f28953 Kalle Valo 2019-11-23 5644 stats->stats_id = 0;
>> > d5c65159f28953 Kalle Valo 2019-11-23 5645
>> > d5c65159f28953 Kalle Valo 2019-11-23 5646 for (i = 0; i <
>> > ev->num_pdev_stats; i++) {
>> > d5c65159f28953 Kalle Valo 2019-11-23 5647 const struct wmi_pdev_stats
>> > *src;
>> > d5c65159f28953 Kalle Valo 2019-11-23 5648 struct ath11k_fw_stats_pdev
>> > *dst;
>> > d5c65159f28953 Kalle Valo 2019-11-23 5649
>> > d5c65159f28953 Kalle Valo 2019-11-23 5650 src = data;
>> > bc5c448b70ff14 Wen Gong 2021-12-08 @5651 if (len < sizeof(*src))
>> >
>> > "len" is never initialized.
>>
>> I only quickly looked at this, but AFAICS ath11k_wmi_tlv_iter() provides
>> len to ath11k_wmi_tlv_fw_stats_parse() which again provides len to
>> ath11k_wmi_tlv_fw_stats_data_parse(). I'm not seeing how this is
>> uninitalised, did I miss something?
>
> I think the bug was fixed and the tree was rebased?
Most likely there were some changes, but I can't remember anymore. Too
many patches :)
> I only look at the email and hit forward and the code in the email was
> clearly buggy but tree looks okay now as you say.
Good, thanks for checking.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches