Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the perf tree
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Tue Jan 11 2022 - 16:45:59 EST
Hi all,
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 14:28:37 +0530 kajoljain <kjain@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 1/6/22 3:49 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > After merging the perf tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:17,
> > from arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h:12,
> > from arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c:9:
> > arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c: In function 'isa207_find_source':
> > include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h:1339:11: error: 'PERF_MEM_HOPS_2' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'PERF_MEM_HOPS_0'?
> > 1339 | (((__u64)PERF_MEM_##a##_##s) << PERF_MEM_##a##_SHIFT)
> > | ^~~~~~~~~
> > arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h:273:20: note: in expansion of macro 'PERF_MEM_S'
> > 273 | #define P(a, b) PERF_MEM_S(a, b)
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~
> > arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c:240:51: note: in expansion of macro 'P'
> > 240 | ret |= PH(LVL, REM_RAM1) | REM | LEVEL(RAM) | P(HOPS, 2);
> > | ^
> > include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h:1339:11: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> > 1339 | (((__u64)PERF_MEM_##a##_##s) << PERF_MEM_##a##_SHIFT)
> > | ^~~~~~~~~
> > arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h:273:20: note: in expansion of macro 'PERF_MEM_S'
> > 273 | #define P(a, b) PERF_MEM_S(a, b)
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~
> > arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c:240:51: note: in expansion of macro 'P'
> > 240 | ret |= PH(LVL, REM_RAM1) | REM | LEVEL(RAM) | P(HOPS, 2);
> > | ^
> > include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h:1339:11: error: 'PERF_MEM_HOPS_3' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'PERF_MEM_HOPS_0'?
> > 1339 | (((__u64)PERF_MEM_##a##_##s) << PERF_MEM_##a##_SHIFT)
> > | ^~~~~~~~~
> > arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h:273:20: note: in expansion of macro 'PERF_MEM_S'
> > 273 | #define P(a, b) PERF_MEM_S(a, b)
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~
> > arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c:244:51: note: in expansion of macro 'P'
> > 244 | ret |= PH(LVL, REM_RAM2) | REM | LEVEL(RAM) | P(HOPS, 3);
> > | ^
> >
> > Caused by commit
> >
> > af2b24f228a0 ("perf powerpc: Add data source encodings for power10 platform")
> >
> > It looks like patch 1/4 of this series is missing ...
>
> Hi Stephen,
> Yes you are right, original patch series contain 4 patches, where
> 1/4 patch contain kernel side changes for the same. Hence we are getting
> this error, as that patch is missing in the Arnaldo tree.
>
> Link to the patchset: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/12/6/143
>
> That kernel side patch is taken by Michael Ellermen via powerpc git.
>
> Link to the patchset on powerpc/next:
>
> [1/4] perf: Add new macros for mem_hops field
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git/commit/?id=cb1c4aba055f928ffae0c868e8dfe08eeab302e7
>
>
> [3/4] powerpc/perf: Add encodings to represent data based on newer
> composite PERF_MEM_LVLNUM* fields
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git/commit/?id=4a20ee106154ac1765dea97932faad29f0ba57fc
>
> [4/4] powerpc/perf: Add data source encodings for power10 platform
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git/commit/?id=6ed05a8efda56e5be11081954929421de19cce88
>
> Thanks,
> Kajol Jain
>
> >
> > I have used the perf tree from next-20220105 for today.
> >
I am still getting this build failure.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpFP0cbt2szQ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature