Re: [PATCH] drivers/pcmcia: Fix ifdef covering yenta_pm_ops

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 02:50:26PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 1:54 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Currently, yenta_dev_suspend_noirq(), yenta_dev_resume_noirq(),
> > and yenta_pm_ops are covered by "#ifdef CONFIG_PM", which results in
> > compiler warnings in kernels built with CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n and CONFIG_PM=y:
> 
> Hmm. Wasn't the pcmcia tree in -next? Or how did this get missed?

This bug happens when running the rcuscale and refscale tests, not the
usual rcu, lock, and scf torture tests.  So I would catch it only if
I ran my overnight torture-everything test against -next during the
critical time, which I failed to do this time.  :-/

My guess is that others building such kernels don't often test against
-next.

For whatever it is worth, here is my overnight torture-everything test,
which takes about 15 hours on a 16-CPU system:

./tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/torture.sh --duration 10 --do-kcsan --kcsan-kmake-arg "CC=clang-11"

> Anyway, applied directly. Thanks,

Thank you!

							Thanx, Paul