[PATCH v2] mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: Check for error num after setting mask

[Jiasheng Jiang]

Because of the possible failure of the dma_supported(), the
dma_set_mask_and_coherent() may return error num.
Therefore, it should be better to check it and return the error if
fails.
And since the sdhci_setup_host() has already checked the return value of
the enable_dma, we need not check it in sdhci_resume_host() again.

Fixes: 5552d7ad596c ("mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: set proper dma mask for ls104x chips")
Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changelog

v1 -> v2

* Change 1. Remove the change of esdhc_of_resume and refine the commit
* message.
---
 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
index a593b1fbd69e..0f3658b36513 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
@@ -524,12 +524,16 @@ static void esdhc_of_adma_workaround(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 intmask)
 
 static int esdhc_of_enable_dma(struct sdhci_host *host)
 {
+	int ret;
 	u32 value;
 	struct device *dev = mmc_dev(host->mmc);
 
 	if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "fsl,ls1043a-esdhc") ||
-	    of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "fsl,ls1046a-esdhc"))
-		dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(40));
+	    of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "fsl,ls1046a-esdhc")) {
+		ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(40));
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
 
 	value = sdhci_readl(host, ESDHC_DMA_SYSCTL);
 
-- 
2.25.1